Saturday, October 26, 2013

When We Want To— We Can Do It

Before the actual beginning of World War II, the United States began preparing for a war that many thought was inevitable.  We enlarged the army and began stockpiling the supplies that we thought would be necessary to fight the war.  Despite good intentions, these preparation were almost laughable.

When the war started, the army had 37 divisions—about 12% of the size of the eventual army—and we had enough supplies stockpiled for only one division to fight.  This was woefully inadequate, but the government quickly turned to mobilizing our industries to produce the supplies necessary to prosecute the war.

During the next three and a half years, wartime production was astounding.  Do you have any idea what a 1942 Chevrolet looked like?  It looked exactly like a 1942 Ford.  It had treads and a 75mm cannon.  Singer sewing machines came in .45 caliber.  Typewriter companies--many of which had gotten their start producing firearms during the Civil War--returned to their historic roots by making pistols and carbines.  Most existing industries shifted over to producing the materiel the military desperately needed.

The production numbers were staggering.  During the war, this country produced 86,000 tanks and we  built 297,000 airplanes and trained a vast army of young men to fly them.  (To put that number in perspective, that's about 50 times the size of the present US Air Force).  We also built machine guns for those planes and tanks (One estimate puts the total number of machine guns built at 4 million.)  This is in addition to the 15 million rifles we manufactured during the war years.

Besides tanks, we built 2 million army trucks and 640,000 jeeps—about a third of which were donated to our allies.  And of course, we made the tires and parts to maintain those jeeps, too.  To keep up with production, at one point we shipped an entire Ford production plant to Russia, set it up, and began manufacturing vehicles there.

And ships!--did we ever make ships!  During just the war years, we made 64,000 landing craft and 6,500 ships.  We built sixteen aircraft carriers and 288 submarines during the war.  And one man, Henry Kaiser, astounded the world by producing 747 large cargo ships.  Despite the fact that Kaiser knew so little about ship design that even by the end of the war he was still referring to the “left” and “right” sides of a ship, he certainly understood construction and mass production!

Building new shipyards and using innovative methods, he shortened production time to unbelievable levels.  The keel for the USS Robert E. Peary (DE-132, a 306-ft destroyer escort), was laid on Sunday, November 8, 1942 and the ship was launched 4 days, 15 hours later.  This cut almost six days off the previous record, also set by Henry Kaiser.

Those new dockyards attracted workers by the thousands, and health care for these workers also had to be provided.  Here, too, Kaiser was innovative.  He started the first HMO to care for his employees.  Seventy years later, the country’s largest HMO is still Kaiser Permanente.

Clothing companies made uniforms, shoe companies made boots, publishing companies made military manuals—and all of this production was numbered in the tens of millions.  There is simply no way to estimate the number of military bases, camps, and government buildings constructed during the war.  We can note, however, that the Pentagon was started in 1941 and finished in 1942 (no mean task for a building of 3.7 million square feet!).

During those three and a half years, the country created 7 million new jobs and trained the men--and women, whose presence in the work force doubled during the same time—to handle these jobs. (This is in addition to the 16 million men in uniform.)

It is important to remember that all of this production was of very high quality and subject to constant innovation and improvement.  Take the example of aviation:  at the beginning of the war, many military planes were still biplanes and Orville Wright was still alive.  By the end of the war, pilots were flying both jet and rocket planes.  Wright made his last flight during the war--in a Lockheed Constellation--piloted by Howard Hughes.  No one knows if Wright got to take the controls at all, but we do know that he made the observation that the Constellation's wingspan was longer than his first flight had been just 41 years earlier.

But, that was 70 years ago.  What happened?  Today, in slightly more time than the duration of World War II, our government seems to have hit its operational limit at producing a web page which--as I write this--still cannot verify my existence, despite my having paid income taxes for half a century.  I'm not convinced that our nation needs a national health care system, but if we must have one, let's do it superbly.

Where is Henry Kaiser when we need him?

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Musings Over a Martini

The old Islander Beach Hotel, a sprawling, massive hulk on Galveston Island, was owned by a large family, who lived in a suite of rooms there.  While I ran the hotel itself, the owner requested that I allow his aging mother to "manage" the many snack vending machines on the property.  He wanted to keep her busy and out of his hair, while at the same time giving her the illusion of being useful.

Having to collect the money, periodically restock the machines, and order the assorted chips, pretzels, and cookies was a job that I thought was a pain in the ass, so, if the 80-year old grandmother wanted to play with the machines, I thought it was a great idea.

To be fair, the elderly woman really worked at the job.  As fast as someone bought a bag of peanuts, she restocked that machine and removed the coins.  And she kept meticulous records--how much of each item was sold per day by each machine.  After about a month of this, she told me (confidentially) that Lays Plain Potato Chips were our best sellers.  I tried to look pleased, even though I couldn't have cared less.  I think that was the same week I learned that one of the engineers "thought" he saw a coral snake in the basement.  I would rather have had 50 "real snakes" than one "maybe snake"--if for no other reason that eventually you will find all the real ones.

Almost immediately, I forgot about the potato chips--at least until the morning, when I walked by one of the machines and stopped and stared: It was filled with Lays Plain Potato Chips--and nothing but Lays Plain Potato Chips.  A quick search of the other machines revealed that they, too, all were stocked exclusively with Lays Plain Potato Chips!

Obviously, my helpful granny had decided that since those chips were the best seller, they were all we needed to sell.  Two weeks later, she was completely mystified because sales had all but stopped.  Not only were total sales down, but we were actually selling fewer Lays Plain Potato Chips than we had before.    Granny could not (and never did) understand that it was the variety of snacks available that attracted customers, even if they eventually usually settled for just plain chips.

Lately, it seems that government doesn't understand a free market any better than Granny understood about those chips.  You cannot lower prices by controlling a market.  While this has been tried many times, the inevitable results are higher prices and shortages.  Whether you call government controls "price freezes" or a "socialized market", they never work.

The only arrangement in history that has consistently led to lower prices and improved quality at the same time is an open and free competitive market.

Competition and innovation--not government intervention--bring down prices.  Brain power--innovation prompted by the opportunity to be amply rewarded--coupled with competition will always lower prices.  Force--and that is the nature of all government intervention--invariably fails at this.

A sad corollary of this rule is that innovation occurs where it is most rewarded.  Free markets prompt innovation, while a centrally-planned economy is slow to reward innovation and is therefore slow to change.  It is for this reason that here in the United States, Hewlett-Packard files more patent applications a week than some countries will see filed in their stagnant patent offices in a year.  Over half the patents in the world last year came from either the United States or Japan.  And no one in the world is reading this on a new computer developed in Saudi Arabia.

Remember the Space Race?  Did NASA put a man on the moon?  Or was it thousands of contractors bent on profit, each designing and competing for the contract to build the lunar lander and other components?  If I remember right, it was North American Aviation that built that landing module, after a competition with every other aviation company in America.  Exactly what has the US Government designed?  Tax forms?

The urge to have a centrally-planned economy is understandable.  The free market sometimes appears to have incredible waste and duplication, and is by its very nature chaotic.  For every winner, there are a dozen losers.  It would seem so much simpler and more efficient to have the government take over all planning and enforce low cost standardization.

For example, the next time you are in a grocery store, find the condiment section and look at all the kinds of olives for sale.  There are cheap olives, some expensive brands, so many kinds and varieties, and so many different sizes of jars and cans.  The temptation to lower cost and preserve quality by imposing a government standard is very real and understandable.   Couldn't we just lower the cost for all consumers by limiting the selection and standardizing production, thus maintaining the highest quality for the price?

No!  Every time in history this has been tried, sales go down because some people don't want plain potato chips. (Or plain olives).  And as sales go down, eventually the cost will go up and quality will drop.

No matter how much we desire to control a market, even supposedly for the sake of the consumer--the surest road to a fair price and high quality is to leave the market alone.  Besides, I like anchovy-stuffed olives in my martinis.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Dear Alice

How is my first favorite granddaughter?  I have a story for you, and since this letter is sent to you inside a book, I bet you have already guessed what the story is about.  Do you sometimes think your grandfather is crazy about books?  It's okay if you do, since your father has told me that for years and years and years.

When I was ten years old, I borrowed a book from the Ft. Worth Library bookmobile.  The bookmobile was a special bus full of books that would drive around to towns that were too small to have their own library.  I still think that bookmobiles may be the best thing that has been invented since the printing press.  I read once that Mexico had built special wooden boxes of books that could be strapped on the backs of mules so that books could be taken to children who lived in the bottom of a deep canyons.  Would you call that a BookMoMule?  We will have to talk about that someday.

Well, the book I found in the bookmobile was Binkie's Billions, a book about a boy with a pet ostrich.

Unfortunately, I lost the book before I could finish reading it.  Since I had checked it out, I had to pay the library for the lost book.   I looked and looked, but I never found the book.  And the library did not have another copy--so I could not finish reading the book. 

I never forgot the book, so it bothered me that I didn't know how the book ended.  Did Binkie get to keep the ostrich?  Did his grandmother lose their house to the bank?  How was I ever going to find out what happened?

Reading a book is like making new friends and not finishing a book is like being rude to your new friend.  You want to know what happened to him.

I looked for a copy of the book in bookstores and libraries all over the country, but no matter where I looked, no one had a copy for me to read.  It sounds silly, but even as I got older, I really wanted to finish that book.  I could remember exactly what chapter I had been reading when I lost the book.

Once, I got pretty close.  I was at the Library of Congress in Washington DC.  This is one of the largest libraries in the world.  I checked the card catalog and they had a copy!  You can't take books out of this library, you can only read them while you are in the library.  When the librarian brought me the copy, I couldn't believe it--Binkie's Billions!  It had the same blue cover with the picture of a boy and an ostrich--exactly how I remembered it!

Unfortunately, I didn't have time to read it.  I was visiting the library with a group of people who didn't want to sit in a library, waiting while a grown man read a book written for kids.  (They were looking at me like I was crazy.  Over the years, I have gotten used to that.)  Washington DC is full of lots of wonderful museums and art galleries and the people I was with wanted to go see them instead of waiting while I read the last 100 pages of the book.

Then I had an idea, I could just read the last chapter of the book!  Then I would know how the story ended--what happened to Binkie.  More importantly, I could stop thinking about the book--not having finished reading that book had bothered me for years, now I could quickly read the last seven pages and finally, at long last, forget the book.

But skipping to the last chapter of a book is wrong. You are cheating the author of a chance to tell the whole story.  Skipping to the last chapter of a book is a sin that earns you a spot in a special place in Hell--a place that is normally reserved for people who talk in movie theaters or for graduate students who don't do their homework.

Fifty years after I lost the book, I found another copy.  A library was selling off a lot of old books and one was Binkie's Billions.   I bought the book immediately.  And today, it came in the mail.  If you look inside the front cover, you will find the card the library used to keep track of all the books they loan out.  Lots of boys and girls read the book from 1954 to 1964.  Then for ten years, only one person checked the book out.  And no one read it after 1974.  I wonder why?  Did people get tired of ostriches?  Did they only want to read books about space ships and magic?  I don't know.

Evidently, the book sat on a shelf for years and years and years, with no one caring enough about Binkie to read his story.  But I got the book today and I immediately sat down and read it from the first page to the end.  Fifty years after I started the book, now, I finally know what happened to Binkie and his ostrich.  I could tell you what happened, but then we would both go to that special place in Hell.  You'll have to read it for yourself.  I bet it doesn't take you fifty years to finish the book.

I think you will like Binkie.  And I'll give you one small hint:  the ostrich's name is George.

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Run, Chicken, Run

A man was driving down a country road one day when he happened to glance in the rear view mirror.  There was a chicken running down the road as fast as greased lightning.  In no time at all, the chicken caught up with the car and began to actually pass it!

The man glanced down at the speedometer and couldn't believe his eyes.  He was driving at 35 miles an hour, and was about to be passed by a chicken!  Even more amazing, as the feathered fury began to pass him, he was startled to see that the bird had three legs!

Fascinated, he sped up and stayed right behind the rapid rooster and followed him to a lonely farm house.  As he pulled to a stop, he saw a farmer standing near the chicken coop.

"Is that amazing bird yours?", he asked.

"Yep." said the farmer.  "Been cross-breeding them for years."

"Why?"

The farmer took off his hat, leaned back against the chicken coop as he scratched the back of his head and said, "Well...  I like the drumstick best and so does Ma.  Then Junior came along and he wants a drumstick, too.
Three-legged chickens just seemed the easiest way."

The man was impressed.  "How do they taste?", he asked.

The farmer put his hat back on his head, stood tall, and looked the man straight in the eye.  "Wouldn't rightly know." he said.  "Ain't caught one yet."

Enema U has lost a whole bunch more football games.  So many that we have become something of a national joke on television.  Earlier in the year, one of our regents wrote a letter to the local paper stating that it was through football that the university would establish a "brand".  It turns out that he was right--we have established a brand.  We are somewhere between the Exxon Valdez and Lehman Brothers, with a small dash of Lindsey Lohan. 

God knows we can't blame the athletes--they didn't schedule three "blood" games in one season.  They aren't the ones who transfer over $4 million a year from Academics to supplement an already bloated athletic budget.  And they aren't the ones who have decided to start offering cash incentives to bribe students into a stadium they clearly want to avoid--despite receiving free tickets.

Academics versus athletics is an old argument.  (Is it actually an argument when you have to repeat simple truths endlessly to idiots, in the futile hope that eventually they will understand?) 

No--Just for a moment, let's try to see this discussion from the regent's point of view. Let us pretend that we finally caught the fast fowl and that Enema U had a winning season.  Now what? 

It won't make us any money.  The program wouldn't show a profit even if every seat in the stands were full and every fan had someone sitting in his (or her) lap.  Do the math: The stadium holds 30,000 people, the tickets cost $20, and we have--at most--eight home games.    After the 15,000 students get in for free, you still don't fully fund the football program.  (Regents?  If this is confusing, print it out and take it to your next book burning.  Maybe someone can help you with the big words.)

If the team suddenly starts winning, the regents won't want to cut the funding--meaning that most of the academic departments will continue their efforts to be sponsored by fly-covered children in Africa.  The laws of athletic funding are simple: When they lose--they need more money.  When they win--they deserve more funding.

Will university enrollment go up if we start winning?  The regents obviously think so, but if this is true, what attracts the students we have now?  If our current students enrolled at Enema U for its current team--they have to be idiots.  If we start winning, will we lose our base?  What kind of student picks a university based on its football team anyway?

Will a winning season mean the library once again can subscribe to the missing journals that we need?  Will there suddenly be enough classrooms?  Can we afford to hire enough faculty?  Just exactly what will change at Enema U if we suddenly have a vibrant football season?

I understand that our university president remembers college athletics from the days when cars had fins, televisions were black and white, mothers stayed home with the kids, and our president spent most of his time on the golf course.  Times have changed and only the last item is still true.  It is okay if the university changes too.  Quit trying to catch the chicken!

Here's a suggestion:  Why don't we try to make everyone happy?  If we drop down a division, Enema U would win more games, it would cost a hell of a lot less, and the team would consist of more locals--a move that would guarantee more community support.  This small change would guarantee that everyone would be happy.  The regents could continue to relive a past that probably never was and the rest of the school could afford to stop holding bake sales to fund research.

We could make everyone happy.  Kind of reminds me of a veterinarian we used to have back home.  He was a pretty good animal doc and an even better taxidermist.  It was always kind of reassuring that no matter what, you were gonna' get your dog back.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

They Shoot Magpies, Don’t They?

This last week, I was surprised to see a letter to the local newspaper from Maggie Magpie, denouncing capitalism, the free enterprise system, private property, and the designated hitter rule.  The topics weren't surprising---that the old bat is still alive is shocking.  I thought that, by now, she would have screamed herself to death.

I should probably change the name of this blog to “Apropos of Nothing Whatsoever”, since every time I start typing, I think of three other things I want to write about.  I just realized that when I think about Maggie Magpie, I mentally picture Marjorie Main playing Ma Kettle.  Not only is there a certain resemblance, and not only did Maggie have about the same mental acuity as Ma Kettle, but Marjorie Main just seemed to have a career that started during the Civil War and never ended.  I can remember seeing her in countless movies, and every time I saw her I had the same thought—Is she still alive?  So it is with Maggie Magpie.

I think I first met Maggie when Fred Dabney, a friend, introduced us.   (One of these days, I’m going to get even with Fred for this.  It will, however,  be difficult, since as I write this, Fred’s ashes are in a cardboard box on a shelf in my office.  This is, perhaps, why I have yet to decide where to sprinkle his ashes—I have it narrowed down to the third floor of Enema U’s library or Chernobyl.)  Fred brought this elderly…lady...to my computer store because she was looking to buy a new computer.  And for several months, that is all she did—look at them.  I spent approximately the same amount of time with Maggie that it would take for someone to learn Chinese.  If I had known that she was looking for a computer to use to send exasperating letters to the local paper for the next three decades, this story would have reached exactly the same conclusion, but several months earlier.

And when she finally picked a computer, she did it exactly the annoying way Maggie does everything.

Among other computers, my store sold Kaypro Computers.  This was the age of Portable Computers.  This meant that for a fairly large sum of money, you could buy a computer with a tiny screen that folded up into a large metal suitcase--a more accurate term for these computers would have been "Luggable Computers".  Laptops were not yet available, but every company was working on them.  Kaypro, realizing that the market was rapidly changing, decided to eliminate its back stock of old obsolete parts by designing what must have been the worst computer ever made:  the Kaypro Robie.

Now, if you are designing a new electric motor, your design does not include a bathtub just because you happen to have one handy--unless, of course, you were Kaypro Computers back then.  They must have had warehouses of old, obsolete parts.  The Kaypro Robie was horrible—as the sum of its bad parts, it was colossally bad—and Kaypro knew it.  The price was low, but dealers were warned that ALL sales were final.  The manufacturer would not accept the return of a Robie for any reason.  They certainly did not want any of those old obsolete parts back.  I took one look at the Robie and refused to sell them.

Maggie had other ideas.  She saw one of these monsters advertised in a magazine—they were nicknamed “Darth Vader’s Lunchbox”—and demanded one.  (I had never advertised the Robie, since I had refused to sell it in my store.)  I tried, really tried, to not sell her one.  I explained over and over that the machine was junk, I offered her a great deal on a better computer, I begged her not to buy one….but she insisted.  I think she believed that I was trying to either cheat her or keep her from buying her dream computer.  Finally, forced by my dealership agreement with Kaypro, I had to sell her the computer.  I wrote Maggie a registered letter explaining my reservations and spelling out exactly the terms of the sale—that the computer was non-returnable and she would have to pay for it in advance.  Maggie promptly paid and I ordered the monstrosity. 

It took Maggie less than a week to discover the machine was junk.  Maggie is crazy, but she ain’t stupid.  And of course she wanted to return the machine!  While I was sympathetic, there was nothing I could do:  Kaypro wouldn’t take it back, and I couldn’t and I wouldn't sell it to someone else.  Maggie yelled, then cried, and then screamed threats as she left my store.  I have to admit that the thought of losing Maggie Magpie as a customer was the only bright part of the sale.  (Besides the small profit, that is.)

About two weeks later, I got an official letter from the State of New Mexico, informing me that Ms. Magpie had filed charges against me with the State Attorney General--specifically, Maggie thought I was guilty of fraudulent advertising.  The common term for this crime is “Bait and Switch.”  Even though I was obviously cheating an elderly woman out of her life savings, the complaint was dropped as soon as I produced a copy of the letter.

Two months later, Maggie came in the store looking for a printer.  I gently—but firmly—took her by the shoulder and escorted her to the door.  Maggie Magpie was the only customer I ever threw out of my store. 

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Maintenance Wars

From my experience managing hotels, I can tell you that there is no such thing  as a decent maintenance man.  By that, I mean one worth a tinker's dam at fixing anything.  While I was running a hotel, I could have cared less if one was decent or not, as long as he could tell which end of a screwdriver to put in his hand.  Unfortunately, service guys with even that small level of competence were few and far between.

To be fair, I'm limiting the remarks above to the Continental United States only.  A friend of mine is a maintenance man at a nice hotel in Hawaii, so I will begrudgingly grant him the benefit of the doubt--at least if he doesn't take too long to invite me out for a visit.  (Albert?  Are you listening?)

A few of the maintenance men I have worked with have been spectacular trouble--real  "ruin your whole year" kind of trouble.  "Kevin" (I can no longer remember what the bastard's real name was) was a prime example.  Kevin wandered into the old Jack Tar Hotel one day and asked for a job in construction.  Looking back on it, I suspect that his car was out of gas and he couldn't figure out how to leave the island.  No matter--that hotel was always  in need of maintenance--that poor 'ol aging beachfront hotel had seen way too many years and hurricanes, and being located only about two hundred yards from salt water hadn't done her much good, either.  I could have hired Jesus Christ as a maintenance man and the place would have still needed more help.  One carpenter--even a miraculous one--couldn't have fixed all the troubles.

I hired Kevin on the spot, and gave him and his wife an aging room in the oldest section of the hotel to live in.  When suitably motivated, Kevin could work, but he turned out to be a much better magician than maintenance man.  Anytime there was a really nasty and dirty job Kevin could vanish for hours at a time. (For reference, the picture is me, after I finished cleaning the hotel's main boiler.)

As a matter of fact, Kevin was so good at vanishing that one day he did it completely.  I mean, he just flat disappeared.  The first I knew of it was when his wife came looking for him.  She had lunch waiting, and he hadn't shown up.  By that night, he still hadn't shown up.  We didn't think he had run off, since it was payday, and he hadn't collected his wages. 

After he was missing a whole day, I got the housecleaning staff together and we searched the whole hotel.  This was a long, two-story hotel, with multiple buildings, hundreds of rooms, two restaurants, three bars, basements, and tunnels connecting the buildings, so there were thousands of hiding places.  We looked all day long--I called in all the employees who had a day off.  No Kevin.  So we called the police and the next day, the police helped us search everywhere, again.  No Kevin.

After about a week, Kevin's parents got into the act.  After being threatened with a lawsuit, we searched that hotel a third time.  By now, we had spent a hell of a lot of man-hours, at considerable payroll cost, searching for a guy who we suspected just wasn't there.  His paycheck, his wife, his car, and his clothing were still there, but...No  Kevin.

Eventually, we gave up.  Kevin's wife moved out, we rented his former room, and I mostly forgot about Kevin.  Then one day, I picked up the newspaper and read a story about the unidentified remains of a man being found in the swamp at the east end of the island.  If you drew a line on a map between the hotel and Tuffy's Bar--a place on the far eastern tip of the island frequented only by the locals--it would pass right through that swamp.  Could it be Kevin?

I called up the police, who connected me with the coroner, and I described my missing man.

"He was over six feet, thin, with sandy blond hair and a beard, and wearing shorts, a khaki shirt, and boon-docker laced boots," I said.  I had given that description so many times, I could do it in my sleep.

"Yeah," the coroner said.  "This could be your man.  You better come view him."

Most people who know me would probably say that I'm not exactly the squeamish kind.  Quite a few might even be emphatic making this point.  Still, I did not  want to do this.  Kevin--if that was him--had lain in that swamp during the summer for months.  I will spare you the grisly details, but there are....critters....that live in a coastal swamp.

So I went down to the coroner's office and viewed the body--what was left of it.  Years later, I got a degree in Anthropology.  I have taken a few classes where you have to identify bones and determine the sex of a skull, etc.  But even then--without any formal training--I could immediately tell that the body I was viewing belonged to a short, stocky, black man, who had been in that swamp for only a few days.  Not Kevin.

Later, of course, I found out that the coroner was a sadistic bastard who had everyone come view every body, identified or not.  Evidently, it's lonely, being the only person alive in a large walk-in refrigerator.  Twisted evil troll!  I hope he ended up in his own cooler.

Eventually, about a year later, we did find out what had happened to Kevin.  His body was found 50 miles away in Houston, inside a stolen van, which had been abandoned inside a storage locker.  According to the police, a motorcycle gang had stolen a van load of leather jackets, and decided to hide all the evidence in a locker which had been prepaid for a year.  Only Kevin knew their connection, and he wasn't talking.  This will never be on an episode of "Storage Wars!"

Kevin wasn't the only problematic maintenance man: there was also Hobo Joe.  Hobo Joe was--and here you may be way ahead of me--a hobo.  He drifted in and out of town, usually working just long enough to qualify for some form of benefit, then reentering premature retirement.  Unfortunately, during one of his brief forays into gainful employment, I discovered him face down in the back of one of the hotel bars.  Although he was supposedly cleaning a drain, he had elected to clean out a case of hotel beer instead.

When I fired Hobo Joe, he was angry enough to file charges against the hotel with the local Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) people.  According to him, the hotel's basement was a dangerous working environment.  Specifically, in one corner of the vast, labyrinthine cellar, there was a pit, eight feet square and about six feet deep.  At the bottom of the pit were powerful pumps that would switch on automatically in the event of flooding.

According to both Hobo Joe and the people from the office of OSHA, it was a potential hazard that needed both protective rails and a covering grate.  I was notified that an inspector was coming.

Two weeks later, when the inspector finally arrived, I led him down into the basement and to a corner where the inspector could see about 200 square feet of fresh new paint on the floor.

"What happened to the sump pump pit?" the inspector asked.

"When I realized that it was a working hazard, I had it filled in." I answered.

Satisfied with our compliance, the OSHA inspector wrote out a warning and left, happy and content at having demonstrated his bureaucratic power.

I suspect that he would have been a little less happy if I had led him to the correct corner.  Paint is cheaper than railings.  Any good maintenance man will tell you that.

Saturday, September 14, 2013

The South Forty Inches

My garden is pretty much a disaster this year.  The tomato plants started producing late because of the heat and have started dying early just to be perverse.  While the cherry tomatoes were abundant, the large tomatoes--all five of them--probably cost me $25 each. 

The only thing the garden has really successfully produced--besides weeds--is parsley.  While useful, it is hard to build a meal around a plant that is sort of like pubic hair: it's attractive, but you have to push it out of the way before you start to eat.

Even that is now seriously in question.  My parsley is alive with caterpillars, yellow-and-black-striped, big, fat caterpillars.  If it were left to me, I would just spray the plants with Raid and call it good.  (No, I wouldn't worry about pesticides on my food--personally, I think pesticides and cholesterol are probably what give food flavor.)  The Doc, however is about as excited as a boy with a new puppy.  According to her, these ugly worms on steroids will eventually turn into butterflies.  Specifically, Black Swallowtail Butterflies. 

Somehow, The Doc is under the impression that it is okay to sacrifice the parsley crop (you wouldn't believe how much these suckers can eat) so that we can produce a flock of butterflies.  While I admit the butterflies do sort of look like an insect version of the P-38 night interceptors with racing stripes, I can't imagine that they will stay in the back yard long enough for me to even see them after they hatch out.  It is not exactly like a butterfly is useful for anything.

But it has given me an idea.  What would grilled caterpillars taste like?   Think about it--the only thing these bugs have eaten is nice, fresh--and regrettably pesticide-free--parsley.  If you pan-fried them in butter with a lot of garlic and a few chopped scallions....I bet they would taste a little like bacon.  Probably better than escargot.  Linguine a la Lepidoptera. (And it would be an eye-catching dish, too!  Or as the Chinese say: Ho Wok Mei!)

The idea is not as far-fetched as it sounds.  I've eaten fried worms in Mexico.  The Maguey plant--from which we get tequila and mescal--attracts the Tequila Giant Skipper butterfly.  The big red worms that hatch out are considered a delicacy.  While they are often fried and flavoried with lime juice, the best tasting ones can be found in the bottom of a bottle of mescal.

The Doc would never miss a few dozen culled from the herd.  (What is the correct collective noun for a stampede of caterpillars?  In the off chance that no one has yet come up with one--allow me the honor.  From now on, it is a squish of caterpillars.) 

Unfortunately, I would probably find out that pan-fried über worms just taste like chicken.  Lately, everything tastes like chicken--except for chicken and store-bought tomatoes (They both taste like cardboard).

But if the new menu works out as I hope, next year I may just forget all about planting tomatoes, lettuce, and chives, and just plant a few mini-pastures full of parsley for my livestock.  Just in case, I'm working with a pair of noodle-neese pliers and a paperclip to come up with an appropriate micro-branding iron.  Perhaps a flattened W--the Lazy Wiggle.

As a good ol' Texas boy, it is more in my nature to be a rancher than a farmer anyway.

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Congress Is Not in Session


Last Saturday, President Obama surprised the world when he announced that he would "allow" Congress to debate and vote concerning military action against Syria.  As luck would have it, Congress is not currently in session and the only person who can call it back into session is the President.  And the President absolutely does not want to do that.  Why not?

In 1807, President Jefferson had a somewhat similar problem.  The British had long been at war with the French, and in an effort to keep their navy preeminent, had been violating American neutrality by stopping our ships on the high seas and forcibly removing sailors they claimed were "British deserters."  Actually, depending on their manpower shortages, they occasionally just seized Americans and "pressed" them into British service.

The combination of using force to stop American ships and the impressment of our sailors infuriated our infant country, but the fury turned to rage after the British ship, HMS Leopard, attacked the USS Chesapeake just off the coast of Virginia.   The British ship pursued the Chesapeake and fired broadsides into her, forcing the American vessel to lower its colors and allow the British to board her.  The British removed four sailors, one of whom was subsequently hanged.  

The country demanded war--literally screamed for war--and President Jefferson wanted to punish the British.  He didn't like England in the best of times, and this was clearly an act of war just off the American coast, but as president, Jefferson knew that this country was no match for the British.  During his administration, the readiness of the American navy and army had suffered:  put simply, our military was not capable of taking on the British.

Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution gives Congress the right to declare war, and Congress was eager to do just that--but Congress was not in session.  Congressional leaders insisted that Jefferson call a special session, and when Jefferson refused, one newspaper called Jefferson a "dish of skim milk curdling at the head of our nation." 

Jefferson knew that by the time that Congress came back into session, the fury would have abated and the eagerness for war would have  passed---and he was right.   Congress eventually passed a few idiotic trade sanctions that had the net result of impoverishing America and doing almost nothing to the British.  All the economic progress since the revolution was wiped out by the misguided trade sanctions.  Unfortunately, five years later--under a different president--America did declare war on England and the fledgling country just barely survived.

If swift action were what President Obama really wanted, I think he would have called a special session of Congress for the first time in over sixty years.  But on September 9th, when Congress is already scheduled to reconvene, the heat of the moment will have cooled, and a vote for a military strike will be less likely.  What is also clear is that--no matter what happens--the fault will then be on Congress.  

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Syria Does Not Exist

It seems the "President" of Syria has jumped the shark and started to use poison gas on his own people.  The Assad family first seized control of Syria more than 40 years ago and has no intention of relinquishing power as long as it has one citizen left it can murder in the name of stability. 

Using chemical weapons on your own people is an offense that must be punished.  The only problem is that the only real opposition in Syria to the murderous bastard president is the Muslim Brotherhood--an entire bucketload of murderous bastards who hate the United States.   While personally, I would advocate that America enjoy a cold one and do nothing but watch the carnage until there was no one left, evidently, our government feels the need to deliver a message to Syria.

I like the US military, but I think it does a poor job as a postal service.  In my opinion, trying to communicate with crazy people by bombing them will work about as well as baptizing a cat.

About a century and a half ago, Queen Victoria had a similar problem with the looney leader of Bolivia, General Mariano Melgarejo.  General Melgarejo had seized power just a few years  before.  While a crowd was gathered in the square in front of the Palace of Government to chant "vivas" to the former leader, Melgarejo came out onto the balcony, dragging the freshly murdered
corpse of the president, while proclaiming, "The president is dead!  Who Lives Now?" 

The assembled crowd promptly--and wisely--began chanting, "Viva Melgarejo!"

As dictator, Melgarejo was ignorant, brutal, and crazy--the hat trick of bad leadership.  When Brazil sent a peace offering of a beautiful horse, he had the animal stand on a large map of Bolivia while he traced a line around the horse's hoof.  All the land enclosed within the circle was given to Brazil as a reciprocal gift.  When told about the story about Caligula's making his horse a general, Melgarejo promptly made his horse a general in the Bolivian army.

General Melgarejo admired the French--mostly because he didn't know any.  When he heard that the Prussians were attacking France, the dictator ordered the entire Bolivian army to be sent to defend Paris.  When one of the dictator's two-legged generals tried to explain the problem of crossing the Atlantic Ocean, Melgarejo exclaimed, "Don't be stupid!  We will take a short cut through the brush!"

In 1870, General Melgarejo held a banquet to honor his new mistress.  When a British diplomat was offered a glass of chicha, he politely refused and said he preferred chocolate.  Obviously, the diplomat knew that chicha is made by partially chewing corn kernels, then spitting them into a jug to allow the fermentation process to start.  (The saliva helps break down the starch.)

Infuriated by the snub, the dictator forced the diplomat to drink an enormous amount of chocolate, then tied the poor man to a donkey and paraded him through the streets of La Paz.  When the embarrassed diplomat returned to England, he promptly complained to Queen Victoria.  The queen, showing only a little more understanding of geography than the dictator, promptly demanded that warships be sent to Bolivia--only to learn from the Prime Minister that Bolivia was landlocked and had no coast.


This may be a good point in the story to admit that much of this story--like a lot of Latin American history--has a fairly high concentration of bullshit.  Who knows how much of this is really true?  I can tell you, however, that Bolivia is one of the few countries on the planet that Great Britain has not invaded.  On the map above, the countries in white are those that have not (yet) been invaded by Great Britain.

Furious, Queen Victoria ordered a map to be brought to her.  Studying the map, she quickly located Bolivia and drew a large inky 'X' across the country with her pen.

"Bolivia," the queen announced imperiously, "does not exist."


As far as I am concerned, this is as good a message to President Assad as bombing a few civilians who already hate us.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Pope Marcus the Second

This has been a solemn week at Enema U.  We have had a long series of orientations and convocations, I have heard the school fight song played reverently in lofty chambers.... and somewhere it suddenly dawned on me:  I work in organized religion.  Actually, to be specific, being a professor is a lot like being the pope.  Please consider the following evidence:

Professors are infallible.  At least as far as my students think--I can burp in class and three students will write it down in fear that it will be on next week's test.  Students today never challenge authority.  Not only will they believe everything on the internet, but after fifteen minutes of blurry PowerPoint slides, a couple of maps and a few B&W photos of famous dead white men, I can get a class to believe that George Washington bombed Hiroshima.  That is speaking ex cathedra! 

The job is for life.  As soon as the Council of Cardinals (more commonly known as the Committee for Promotion and Tenure) votes in approval and tenure is granted, there is very little chance of removal from office.  Some departments on campus have less turnover than the House of Lords or Congress--with pretty much the same result.  After a few decades of stagnation, quite a few professors become about as spontaneous as stalactites.

We all drive the Popemobile.  Well, most of them are actually Toyota Priuses.  Prii? Prions?  As far as I am concerned, it takes religious fervor to believe that an electric golf cart with weird windows is really a car.  And the Prius is worse.  Actually, this is a very common religious tenet among faculty.  After careful study of the sacred text (The Gospel According to Rachel Carson) you will learn that living the perfect life (No Nukes!  No Fracking! No Exxon!) will return us all to a sustainable Garden of Eden.  (No Fracking Way!)

We spend our days in contemplation and reading.  Ah, the pursuits of the mind.  We slowly walk in unison through the cloisters to the library.  If you listen carefully, you can hear our chant:  Deus bonus est, Deus bonus est, Domino finem fecerit pizza.

Now that you mention it, we speak Latin.  Go to any graduation and look for the faculty--we're easy to spot.  "We be wearin' satin and speakin' Latin".  The school motto, Veni, Vidi, Velcro (I came, I saw, I stuck around) is prominently displayed.  The campus is lousy with Latin inscriptions.  A few of us even know what they mean.

We dress alike.  Papal robes.  Caps and gowns.  We all look like we are wearing some old woman's ugly dress.  The Pope has a better hat, but the faculty don't have to wear ruby slippers from the Wizard of Oz.

During our sermons, people try unsuccessfully to stay awake.  Now this is a problem that I personally do not have in my classes, but I hear that some of my associates have had a few students drift off during their scintillating lectures.  While history is never boring, evidently quite a few historians are

A few...um....decades ago I took a required class in Medieval European Architecture.  Meeting in the afternoon for two and a half hours, the class sat in the dark, looking at endless slides while the professor monotonously droned, "And here we see another fucking old Carolingian church..."

Or at least, that is what I remember before I fell asleep.  The only other place I can remember being this bored was church. 

Neither the pope nor faculty are likely to get laid.  Not only is this officially frowned upon, but as a group, we professors just aren't very cool.  (There evidently haven't been any really cool, sexy university professors since the 1960's!).  For the faculty, sex on campus is unlikely (except for those who teach Animal Husbandry).

And, last but not least, just like any other organized religion, we take people in when they have nothing but beliefs, and force them out when they begin to know something.


Saturday, August 17, 2013

Damn! The Summer is Over!

Classes start up again this week.  Don't get me wrong--I love teaching and I love being in  the classroom and I am very fond of my students (Most of them.)---But the end of summer does bring a few changes, not all of which are welcome.

Other than the calendar, the first sure sign of the start of a new school year is the traffic in town.  About 10% more cars double the noise---and damn near triple the number of accidents in town as a lot of teenage drivers---suffering under a massive overdose of testosterwrong---suddenly return to the town's streets.  The noisy combination of large engines with small mufflers is evidently  the basis of the mating cry for the flowers of American youth:  Blooming Idiots.

Enema U is buzzing with the usual "new" news: 

We have a new coach, Kareem de Blé, who has promised that all of the university's problems will disappear as soon as we win a few games---and this can be easily achieved with just a little more funding.  It is the same old story---the team needs more funding if it loses and deserves more funding if it wins.  (Not that we know much about the latter).

Fresh from the unqualified---or at least unmeasured---success of online education, Enema U has a new program that we are eager to implement ASAP:  Speed Teaching!  Students will spend five minutes per classroom---more than enough time for the professor to hand out printed copies of the PowerPoint presentation and a list of readings that the students couldn't care less about.  When the bell rings, the students have ten minutes to either make it to the next class or simply skip the class as usual and get another cup of overpriced coffee from the increasingly misnamed bookstore.

And we have New Regents!  Nothing improves a university more than fresh political appointees from the governor.  Experience has certainly taught us that political appointees are at least as competent at leadership as lapdogs are suited for hunting.

There has been a flurry of self-important email pronouncements from on high, or as the university quaintly calls them, the Lukewarnings.  Most of the Lukewarnings are short announcements concerning important campus activities such as yet another parking lot closure, the library holding a book burning to raise funds, a progress report on the Biology Department's ongoing quest to breed fat-sucking mosquitoes, and the Department of Internet Control Kabal (ICK) holding yet another class on Effective Teaching Online.  That course, of course, is only taught in a "bricks and mortar" classroom .  Mainly, the Lukewarnings reveal the recent appointments of several new executive vice-presidents

You would think, in an institution where hundreds of faculty members are desperate to publish one more article dealing with such weighty topics as "The Social Mores of Post-Industrial Female Irish Bartenders", lest they, too, should perish, that we could could change the rules just once and grant tenure to the first faculty member who succeeds in writing a program identifying the name and job function of all of the university's currently existing vice-presidents.  Or at least complete the first volume.

Most exciting of all, this time of year, the calendar begins filling up with Committee Meetings.  I can never sit through the beginning of a committee meeting without remembering the old story about one of President Eisenhower's Cabinet meetings.  After the meeting had been underway for a few minutes, Eisenhower suddenly slammed his fist down on the tabletop and exclaimed, "Goddammit!  We forgot the silent prayer!"

University committee meetings are usually the reverse of this---there is a lot of silent praying going on---usually for an early adjournment.  Unfortunately, there is not much chance of any committee's either coming up with any new ideas or even reaching a decision.  Committee meetings never actually achieve consensus---the talk just slowly dwindles after everyone becomes engrossed with playing the mental game of "Whom Shall I Strangle First" and stops talking over one another.  This is the universal signal for adjournment.

And, of course, after a summer where we were constantly a few flying monkeys short for a faculty meeting, we suddenly have a quorum.   There are many, many, great faculty members at Enema U---but there are only two types:   Those whom you would like to have a drink with, and those who make you want to drink---a lot!

I have never really understood the need for faculty meetings, so I only show up because of an undying hope that we will "vote someone off the island".  One candidate I definitely  would vote off would require a rather large barge, but in the meantime, with 7 billion people on this planet, I simply refuse to let one jackass screw up my day as often as he does the faculty meetings.

But even surly-undertoned faculty meetings, where overly-polite professors are too tolerant to stifle perennial rudeness, have given me a valuable insight that I should share: 

No matter how bitter I sound right now, I'll get over it all as soon as I get back into the classroom.


***A small note.  Recently a kind and wise president of a state university passed away.  This man, who had given the better part of his life for the betterment of the university, rode the elevator up to heaven with a recently deceased pope.  When the elevator got to heaven, a host of angels singing hosannahs picked up the scholar and carried him through the golden streets of heaven, which were lined with former students, each cheering the man's entry into his just reward.

The pope, feeling a little neglected, asked God what all the fuss was about.

"Well," God said.  "We get popes up here all the time, but we rarely see a teacher like that man."

He is missed.

Saturday, August 10, 2013

The Legend Creates Reality

Television shows are usually a very poor depiction of reality, especially shows that are supposed to be based on actual events.  You could run a divining rod over most of these shows and it would never find a fact to twitch over.  This is strange, since history is fascinating.  Every war, every scandal, every love affair that has ever occurred is history.  This probably flies in the face of your memories of history class, but trust me--history isn't boring.  Historians are boring.

One method of enlivening history is simply to lie and when it comes to depicting the Wild West, having a good imagination is a lot easier than research.  For a few writers, the truth is pretty much an unwelcome stranger.

Ned Buntline was one such writer.  Ned wrote the dime novels that distorted the West, making up wild tales with only the briefest accidental brush with reality.  His books include The Black Avenger of the Spanish Main and Buffalo Bill and His Adventures In the West.  While both are great reads--neither is even remotely true. 

Interestingly, the story of Ned Buntline is about as fascinating as his yarns.  Buntline was one of several pen names used by Edward Zane Judson, whose real life was far more colorful than most of his novels.  Buntline/Judson went to sea as a midshipman in the age of sail, served in two wars, and fought a duel for which he was tried for murder.  His acquittal angered a local mob, who lynched him--but his friends managed to cut him down and save his life.  Curiously, today he is probably best remembered for supposedly inventing the Colt Buntline--a gun the author neither saw nor even heard of during  his lifetime.

Stuart N. Lake was another writer who never let the truth get in the way of a good story.  Lake wrote the scripts for John Ford's My Darling Clementine and Winchester '73, but it was his 1931 biography of Wyatt Earp that made him, and the relatively obscure lawman famous.  In Wyatt Earp: Frontier Marshall, Lake created the prototype of the heroic western lawman.

While the book is a wild exaggeration of the true life of Earp, one clever invention in it was to  take on a life of its own.  In the book, Lake wrote that Ned Buntline placed an order with Colt Firearms for five custom Peacemaker revolvers, each with a 12-inch barrel and a detachable shoulder stock.  Buntline then supposedly gave the revolvers to the five most colorful lawmen of the time: Wyatt Earp, Charlie Bassett, Bat Masterson, Bill Tilghman, and Neal Brown.  Lake asks us to believe that Buntline's gifts are in gratitude because these  Dodge City peace officers had made the west "colorful" enough to give him a living as a writer.

According to Lake, most of the men cut the barrel extensions off their revolvers to make them easier to carry, but Wyatt Earp kept his a foot long.  Then, when he wasn't shooting bad guys with the gun, he was knocking them senseless--using the pistol as a club.  Lake also tells us that Earp could draw his revolver--with a barrel that went down to his knee--still faster than any desperado could slap leather with a normal-sized gun.

Unfortunately, the story is simply not true.  Buntline never ordered any such gun, and while Colt advertised that it would make a barrel at any length--at a dollar an inch surcharge--it made no pistols in the 19th century with 12-inch barrels.  Nor were those five lawmen all in Dodge at the same time, and Buntline was back east at the time, and,... well, you get the idea.   While it is a great story, and many people have tried to prove it true, there is no proof that Earp ever owned such a gun. 

Through the efforts of such men as Buntline, Lake, and Zane Grey, the Western took off as a standard in the movies, and eventually, on television.  From 1955-1961, Hugh O'Brian played Wyatt Earp weekly in The Life and Legend of Wyatt Earp.  The popular television show hired none other than Stuart Lake as the technical advisor.  Naturally, shortly into the first season (in a script written by Lake) Ned Buntline presented Wyatt Earp with a Buntline Special.  O'Brian/Earp carried the long clumsy revolver for the next six years.

And suddenly, the gun really did exist!  Demand for the gun convinced Colt Firearms to begin production of a .45 caliber Peacemaker with a 12-inch barrel engraved with the legend: Buntline Special.  They have been periodically manufactured ever since.  Not to be outdone, there was even a toy version made for children.  Today, no fewer than four firearms companies make working "reproductions."

At the end of one of one of my favorite movies, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence, a beloved, aging politician, played by Jimmy Stewart, has just confessed that the true hero of a famous gunfight was actually the character played by John Wayne.  This confession would  completely change the popular history of the event.  The newspaper editor takes the notes from the confession and destroys them.

"This is the West, Sir," he says.  "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."

And sometimes, after a century and a half, the legends actually become reality.

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Something, Somewhere, Needs Shooting

More than forty years ago, I had a cramped, overpriced, and ugly apartment on the Gulf Freeway in Houston.  That apartment had almost exactly the same layout as a motel room, and being located on the freeway, it was about as noisy—well, out the front door anyway.  The back side was much quieter—my balcony overlooked the largest cemetery in Houston.

To be fair, there were certain advantages to living next to a cemetery.  It was always quiet—very few loud parties were held there---and I always had fresh flowers for my dates.  At the start of every semester, after paying tuition and buying required textbooks, I was so broke that food became a luxury item.  I eventually shot—and ate—every duck from the cemetery pond.  Ornamental ducks do not taste very good, but hunger is the best sauce.

When I moved into those apartments, the chief attractions for me had been the location and the pool.  I had never lived anywhere with a pool, and could easily imagine myself studying next to the pool, swimming my way through freshman calculus.  I think I may have swum in that pool twice.  The only people who regularly enjoyed that pool were the Houston Police Department.  For traffic control purposes, the city had put a large CCTV camera on a pole next to the freeway.  Remotely operated, the camera could swivel and turn up and down the freeway looking for accidents and traffic jams.

Watching a freeway on a television monitor is probably pretty boring, so it probably isn’t all that surprising that the camera spent most of the time aimed at the pool, instead.  I didn’t mind—my desk was situated so that I could look out the window at that pool, myself.  What I did mind, however, was the number of times I watched the camera slowly panning back and forth, focusing on the apartment windows.  Watching the girls in a public pool was fair game, but playing Peeping Tom with bedroom windows was not!  One night during a noisy thunderstorm, the camera was destroyed when someone shot it with a load of duck shot.

That was forty years ago, when it was much easier to stop unwarranted government spying.  Today, I’m not certain exactly what—or who—needs shooting.

I don’t care how many supposed terrorist attacks have been subverted, my government does not have the right—morally or legally—to monitor what I do on my cell phone or on the internet.   Prove to me that monitoring my cell phone, specifically MY CELL PHONE, has stopped a single terrorist attack ….or stop violating my rights!

My rights under the Fourth Amendment guarantee “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…”  What can be more unreasonable than the government seizing the data and searching databases on every single person in the country?

Nor am I very happy about my medical records.  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) guarantees that my medical records are safe.  Giving those records to the Internal Revenue Service insures that they are not.  Why does the government have a right to seize and maintain my medical records?  Why do they want to turn over all of our records to an agency that has proven it can’t be trusted with a potato gun?

Starting in the fifteenth century, there was an English court of law known as the Star Chamber.  Meeting in secret, and often without the knowledge of the accused, this court exercised enormous power, eventually becoming a political weapon against the enemies of the crown.  Among the abuses was the ability of the prosecutors to present secret written evidence.  This is a fairly apt description of today's Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court that oversees the actions of the National Security Administration.

This is the court that has authorized the continual collection of all cell phone data, domestic and foreign.   To be sure, a warrant allowed this—not surprising when you learn that since 1979 the government has requested 33,949 such warrants.   To date, all but 11 were granted, and 4 of those were still partially granted.  (What in hell were the other 7?  Requests to strip-search dead nuns?)

The FISA court is usually a single judge, appointed by the government, to perform oversight on the government, for the government.  The court operates in secrecy, with no possible civilian scrutiny.  Each judge is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the appointment requires no confirmation or oversight by the Congress.  After the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the Patriot Act extended the powers of this court to allow domestic espionage on U.S. citizens. 

The abuses of the Star Chamber strongly influenced the writing of the 5th amendment.   I guess if we can trash the 4th amendment, it’s not much of a stretch to ignore the 5th.

A last note:  No matter what I write about, I get hate mail—that's fine since I usually correct the grammar and spelling and return the missive with a grade.  I can already predict the content of much of this week's mail: "If you have nothing to hide, why object to the search?"  Ignoring the fact that none of this charade is keeping me safe—or that I have no desire to trade freedom for safety—I know the correct response:

“If I have nothing to hide, why do you need to search me?”