Enema U is having an open discussion about football. Well, actually one of the university's Evil
Overlords wrote a letter to the local newspaper claiming that the university needs
football. As he explained it, football
helps brand the university.
Personally, I think that Division 1 football for a
southwestern Ag school is more like an anchor—or a millstone—around the
financial neck of an impoverished state university, but who am I to argue with
an Evil Overlord. And I confess, not
that long ago, I made a suggestion for re-branding Enema U.
Unfortunately, the whole idea of branding is so
1990’s. It is a marketing idea whose
time has come and gone. Perhaps we
should refer to Jonathan Salem Baskin’s book: Branding Only Works on Cattle—a perfect choice for an Ag school. In his book, Baskin points out that branding
as a marketing scheme simply does not work.
He carefully points out that the Burger King mascot is readily
identifiable, but probably never sold a single hamburger. There is a reason why Taco Bell had the Chihuahua
put to sleep sent to live on the happy farm and Geico sent the cavemen to a
museum. They were identifiable, but did
not attract new customers.
Successful marketing links a product or a service to
something new, valuable, or unique.
Baskin gives the example of Starbucks, who took the common cup of coffee
and promoted the image of high quality and convenience. None of this is possible with a football team
that hasn’t had a winning season since…well, shit! The last time Enema U had a good enough
season to be invited to a bowl game, John-John was playing under President
Kennedy’s desk.
In a media-saturated market, successful marketing no longer
works with cute phrases, goofy mascots, and marching bands. What works is carefully analyzing what our
students really want and then delivering a high quality education. And this will be true no matter how many
times our Evil Overlords scream, “Go, Zombies!”
I hate that whole “Go, Team, Go!” mantra crap. Life is not a game that you play for an
hour. Winners are not the ones with the
most points. Everything truly good in your
life will be the result of years of hard work and preparation and your successes
will be slowly accumulated over time.
You know, kind of a like a four-year degree program. How many places in life would it be
appropriate to scream out these simplistic moronic platitudes to people hard at
work? Do nurses scream at surgeons, “Cut,
Doc, Cut!” in an operating room? The next
time you are on an airplane, get as close as you can to the cockpit door, and
at the last possible moment, scream, “Land, Pilot, Land!” I hope the sky marshal shoots you in the crotch
with a rubber bullet.
Since I have worked at Enema U, the school has probably
spent on football (and I admit this number is only a semi-educated guess--which
means it is probably as ignorant as a lady’s watch) a quarter of a billion
dollars. Fortunately, New Mexico didn’t need that money. The taxpayers couldn’t possibly have done anything more effective with the cash--the state
didn’t need more schools, hospitals,
or fire stations. Surely, the university
hired the finest professors who taught in up-to-date classrooms while charging
the lowest tuition. And I believe in
Tinkerbelle.
Yes, I know what you are thinking: College football brings
in donations and makes lots of money.
No, even in the big league schools it usually doesn’t. Take the time to read the report from the Knight
Commission, or look at the data on the U.S. News and World Report website. That quarter of a billion dollars is over and above gate receipts, donations,
and the loose change the coaches sweep up under the stands after we finish
losing a game.
Naturally, I have a suggestion--a fair suggestion. In order to generate enough cash to continue
to fund the bottomless pit of football, Enema U has privatized several services
on campus. We leased out the campus
bookstore and turned it into a Hukked on
Foniks T-Shirt Shop. We leased out
the cafeterias to a company that specializes in providing meals to airports and
prisons. (Presumably, we get their
leftovers.)
If leasing out university services effectively delivers a
quality product to our students—and I believe that is our state mandate—let’s
shut down the football program until a company steps forward and is willing to
lease it and run it at a profit. Since I’m
sure the coaches and athletic supporters who have claimed that college sports
actually make money have been telling us the absolute truth for years, it
shouldn’t take long for a smart investor to step up and lease our team.
And the new owners can brand each other on any body part
they can reach.
Wonder what the cost per football victory in New Mexico has been - just considering the head coach's salary for UNM and NMSU - for the last two to five years.
ReplyDeleteQuite expensive I would think. We could probably hire quite a few academic professors at each university.
Well, let's do the math. Since the tenured professors are already teaching a full load, let's say we used the $4.5 million transferred annually from academics to football to hire adjunct professors. The average adjunct makes about $4500 per class. Figuring that the administration would absorb half that amount in overhead, that still leaves us with 500 classes per year.
ReplyDeleteSince each class has an average of 30 students, and each student pays $271.40 per credit hour, that works out to $10,863,00 in lost tuition. Of course, this doesn't include book store revenue, fees, and the assorted recouped cost from cafeterias, snacks stores, etc.
So, losing the $4.5 million means we have many millions more squandered in lost tuition. The students lose the benefit of a wider selection of classes. The adjunct lose the chance of employment.
And, of course, all of New Mexico loses the benefit of educated students.
There is a hell of a lot more than one way to lose at football.