Captain
Merriweather Lewis had a problem:
President Jefferson had tasked him with exploring the new lands to the
west of the new nation, so Lewis was to lead a party of 38 men across the
continent to the Pacific Ocean and return.
Along the way, they were expected to map routes, explore the
countryside, live off the land, and secure safe passage through dozens of
Indian tribes' territories.
Naturally,
this was to be a heavily-armed party: while they certainly did not want
to fight hostile Native Americans, they had to be prepared to do so in an
emergency, and they would need to kill wild game for food (and
protection). Unfortunately, sufficient
amounts of gun powder and lead shot were extra weight that would have to be
carried across the continent, and over rivers, mountains and prairies that
lacked a single road-- twice.
All in all, this was a logistical nightmare.

Lewis,
and his partner Clarke, came up with several clever ideas. One was to carry the gunpowder in lead foil
casks. As the gunpowder was used, the
foil casks could be melted down and cast into bullets. The journals of the expedition do not give
much of a description of this, but the expense records still exist, and show
that Lewis bought 420 pounds of sheet lead and paid a plumber to fashion 52
canisters, each weighing 8 pounds and holding 4 pounds of gunpowder. After a lot of trial and error, historians
have estimated that each was about 4 inches wide and 10 inches tall.
It
would seem that about half the gunpowder was carried this way, with the rest
being carried in the usual heavily tarred 24 pound barrels. Still, the expedition found another way to
conserve its precious gunpowder: they took along--and frequently used--an
air-powered rifle.

Toward
the end of the 18th century, a Tyrolian master gunsmith, Bartolomeo
Girandoni,
had created a weapon that was an engineering marvel: The Girandoni air
rifle. Using a hand pump, the shooter
could pressurize a tank in the butt of the rifle sufficiently for the firearm
to fire a .46 caliber ball up to 80 times before the air tank had to be
recharged. Accurate out to about 150
feet, at fifty feet it was accurate enough to put ten rounds in a group about
the size of a quarter. The Austrian Army
actually used the weapon in combat against the Turks. How such a weapon made its way across the
ocean to America is still a mystery.
The
weapon could be fired rapidly since the rifle held 22 balls in a tubular
magazine. In all, the rifle was a
marvel--the only drawback was that the rifle was a little fragile and
recharging the air tank required that a hand pump had to be stroked 1500
times! And for normal military use, the
weapon had a significant disadvantage:
it was far too delicate to mount a bayonet. Until the middle of the 19th century,
traditional military doctrine held that the firearm was used to develop a hole
in the line that was exploited by the bayonet.
In almost all such engagements, far more casualties were cut or stabbed
than shot.
While
there is no record of the expedition's actually hunting with the rifle, it did
prove extremely useful. When the expedition
encountered a new band of Native Americans, the group staged a demonstration of
the air rifle. In particular, they
demonstrated how rapidly the gun could be fired. This subtly gave the natives at least the
suggestion that all the men on the expedition might be similarly armed. If 38 men could each fire 22 times... Well, it was certainly a powerful hint that
it might be best to leave the expedition alone!
(They presumably never demonstrated how long it took to recharge that
air tank!)
Lewis
recorded in his journal that the rifle was demonstrated every time a new tribe
was encountered. Only after that were
the various gifts and trade goods distributed among the natives.
“My Air-gun…astonishes them very much, they cannot comprehend it’s shooting so often and without powder…” -Meriwether Lewis, Jan. 24, 1806
Every
history book tells us that the expedition was successful and remarkably
peaceful. How much of this was due to
the demonstration of the charms of Sacajawea and how much was due to the
impression made by the weapons of the party, I leave to you.
Just discovered your weblog. I added your RSS feed to my home page so I can keep up. I want you to know you cost me an hour of work reading back through your old posts. It's not many university history professors can manage to give a fair and only lightly snarky take on history like your blog does without earning scorn from a jaded old conservative like me. You should put this stuff in a book before you die or the Internet collapses.
ReplyDeleteTom King (twayneking.blogspot.com)