This
week, the blog practically wrote itself.
Two things happened today that have me fixated on thinking about
books. (One glimpse of the inside of my
house would convince you of the timeliness of the topic.)
First, I
wrote a letter to the author of a book I had just finished reading, something
that I rarely do. Titan Tales, by Major John Womack, is an autobiography spanning the
two years he spent as one of the commanders of a Titan II missile silo in
Arkansas. While I originally bought the
book in preparation for an upcoming tour of the last surviving Titan missile
silo, located outside of Tucson, I quickly discovered that the author and I
have so much in common that I felt compelled to write him.
Womack
wrote about living in a small southern town in the early sixties—something I
could relate to. He was a navigator on
the B-58 Hustler, a plane I could remember flying so low over my schoolyard
that we could catch a faint whiff of kerosene.
After he retired from the Air Force, Womack taught college, retired from
that, and writes an interesting blog. As
I said, we have a lot in common.
Compared
to the rest of the books mentioned here, Womack's book was a real pleasure to
read.
The
second event was one of those anonymous posts on Facebook that are so strangely
compelling, labeled, "The 100 hardest to read books of all time". Of course, the list is composed so that the
reader will be pleased to discover that he has read quite a few, so that he can
proudly share that information.
A few of
the books on the list were indeed difficult to slog through, such as 100 Years of Solitude. Evidently, no one really likes that
book. I know this for a fact since I
used to assign it to students to read, every one of whom complained bitterly. I recently found my copy, leafed through it,
and for the life of me cannot remember why I once liked the book. Yes, it is a great example of magical
realism. No, I can’t really remember why
that was important. I apologize to my
former students.
Both
incidents, as I said, got me to thinking about books—Specifically, books I had
not enjoyed reading.
Forty
years ago, I worked for Bantam Books, where I was overpaid to do an easy
job. Mostly, I drove around Texas and
talked to the owners of bookstores about books we were publishing. A minor part of my job was to read books and
guesstimate how they would appeal to the readers in my state. By now, the statute of limitations has worn
off and I can probably get away with using names and book titles.
One of
the bestselling authors the company represented was Barbara Cartland, who
churned out a never ending series of Victorian bodice rippers, each one ending
with a passionate—but chastely demure—kiss.
The company published a couple of her books a month, each so concretely
formulaic that I suspect the company kept a database of locations and character
names to keep from publishing the same book twice by accident. Not that it would really matter, as I suspect
the average reader of such drivel could have cycled endlessly through about a
dozen volumes without ever noticing the repetition.
Keeping
track of her publications was quite a job, since Cartland had set two world
records. Not only had she published the
most books in a single year, she held the record for the most published books
in a lifetime. As a matter of fact, even
though she passed away in 2000, she left behind so many unused manuscripts that
she is still publishing a dozen books a year.
She currently has sold over two billion copies of some 750 odd volumes. The Forest Service should name her Public
Enemy Number 1 for the sheer number of trees she has needlessly murdered.
Bantam
wanted me to read a few of them, so I'd be familiar with her work, although I
have no idea why. Even though every
bookstore sold them, not once did any store manager ask a single question about
her. I suspect that the average store
owner was just about as embarrassed about selling her books as I was.
I really
tried to read one of her books and. I think I managed to read the first two or
three pages and the very last page of about a dozen of them. It was actually kind of difficult to tell the
volumes apart, since not only were the contents nearly identical, but every
volume featured an oil painting by the same artist, Frances Marshall, on its
cover.
Bantam
encouraged us to write a single page book review for every book we read. Since I was in marketing, they were more
interested in how I thought the book would sell rather than my views on the
literary efforts of the author. For
Barbara Cartland, I turned in a one-page undated letter of resignation. In a separate note, I informed my boss that
if he absolutely had to have me review the book, he could just fill in the date
on my letter. He never replied.
There
was another book that I also really tried to read, but found it absolutely
impossible to finish. Watership Down by Richard Adams was
(lucky for me) not published by Bantam, but one of the editors was curious as
to whether I thought the book would sell in Texas. I must have started reading that book a dozen
times and never made it past about page fifty.
I literally could not read it on a salary.
If you
are not familiar with the book—and I sincerely hope not— it deals with a group
of clairvoyant rabbits living in Southern England. (Even Barbara Cartland kept to people.) It was all hop, hop, fluffy, love, bunny,
hop…and then I would fall asleep. I was
terribly tempted to shoot the book, then mail it back to the editor, but I was
afraid he might use that Cartland letter.
Instead, I just told him the book would sell a lot better back east than
in the Southwest...Which it did.
And then
there were the Louis L’Amour books.
Don’t get me wrong—these were good stories. The problem was that I told the publishers
that I could read them in a couple of weeks—a promise that they promptly held
me to. When I foolishly opened my mouth,
I had believed there were a couple of dozen such books, of which I had already
read about half. I was wrong. I spent the next month reading FORTY-EIGHT
Westerns. In a row. That is more than one a day, seven days a
week. I think reading that many westerns
that fast can raise your cholesterol.
If you
look up Louis L’Amour in the Wikipedia, it will tell you that the author wrote
both Westerns and historical fiction. I
heard L'Amour talk about that once and, according to him, if a story took place
east of the Mississippi, it was called historical fiction, but if the story was
set west of the river, it was a Western.
Whether
they are Westerns or historical fiction, I can tell you that if you read enough
of them—all at once—they blur together into Bang On a Horse!
Which,
as I think back on it, is still a much better story than a clairvoyant bunny.
I completely agree with your take on Barbara Cartland. I found her hard to deal with even when I WAS reading trashy, garbage-y romance novels! Thanks for the chuckle this morning!
ReplyDeleteI actually read Watership Down once back when I was a speed reader and had kids. I was a glutton for punishment back in them days. I buzzed through it before taking the kids to see the movie. I thought surely they would edit out the bit about war and murder, but noooooo.... Sure enough the rabbit warren had a good old English murder. The only thing I was happy about was that the rabbits spared me the scene in the parlor of some Tudor mansion where the murderer was revealed. Apparently English bunnies have no penal system and whoever is not dead when the altercation is over gets to be boss bunny. I found it a bit disturbing and regretted taking the kids to see it.
ReplyDeleteVictorian Bodice rippers I fortunately have been spared as well as those heaving bosom types with Fabio on the cover. Give me CS Forester and Captain Horatio Hornblower and I'll spend the day with the book. I've been doing reviews for some friends who are authors lately. I suspect they run about the same speed as Barbara Cartland. Only Barbara wouldn't have agreed to read my book and write a nice review in exchange. (It's a racket, I know, but it's harder to sell books in this new economy.)