For almost five
hundred years, the queen of the seas was a battleship. Beginning with warfare in the Mediterranean,
the Muslims were the first to add primitive cannons to galley ships,
effectively ending the age-old contest to find the most effective means of
conducting naval warfare—ramming, boarding, or throwing things. Gunpowder artillery—the ultimate method of
throwing things—immediately proved to be the most effective method of
destroying enemy vessels, but the heavy guns required larger ships. This was the birth of the battleship.
While ships
would still be boarded, and the deliberate ramming of enemy ships would still
occur as late as both world wars, it would be the artillery aboard ships that
would dominate what the Greeks called "thalassocracy"—the control of
the seas—for centuries.
The first use of
the phrase “great ship” occurred during the reign of Henry V, in an inventory
of his navy. At the time, these fighting
ships were little more than commercial vessels (usually carracks) with fighting
castles constructed on their decks to provide platforms for archers, men armed
with primitive muskets, or for small cannons.
The term, "forecastle" is a reminder of this age.
Over time, ships
grew in size, as did their armament. By
the time of the American Revolution, a first-rate ship of the line might
contain more than a hundred cannons, throwing solid iron balls of roughly 40
pounds at a distance up to a mile.
(While the main gun decks of the HMS Victory (commissioned in 1778) used
32- and 24-pounders, the forecastle housed a pair of 68-pound carronades.)
Over the next
century, the ships went from wood to steel, powered by steam turbines, gained
rifled cannons with fire control systems, and became the behemoths we
associated with the term battleship. By
the end of the Nineteenth Century, battleships became the main tool of powerful
nations to protect imperial possessions, secure foreign markets, protect trade,
and wage war. Every industrial nation
seeking a place on the world stage, sought to build bigger and more powerful
battleships.
That the
battleship was crucial for the development of an industrial nation was best
reflected in the words of Theodore Roosevelt while still the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy.
“Oh
Lord! if only the people who are
ignorant about our Navy could see those great warships in all their majesty and
beauty, and could realize how well fitted they are to uphold the honor of
America.”
By the turn of
the century, a nation without a battleship was impotent, since an enemy fleet
led by a battleship could easily overpower its navy, use its massive guns to
destroy ports, and reduce coastal cities to rubble. Every country had to have its own
version of the great ship or forever be at the mercy of its enemies.
So every
developed industrial nation did build battleships. It was the fact that every nation possessed
these ultimate weapons of war that produced the terrible paradox. If your country must possess a battleship to survive, you did
not dare use your battleship in an actual battle with other enemy battleships,
for fear that you might lose it, thus losing the whole war.
The reality of
this paradox was not actually realized until the Battle of Jutland in World War
I when the Royal Navy of Great Britain met the High Sea Fleet of Germany. While both sides continue to claim victory,
neither country sought a reengagement, usually keeping its battleships in
harbor for the rest of the war. Winston
Churchill wisely noted that the British admiral in charge was the one man who
could have lost the entire war in an afternoon.
Effectively, the
battleship had become too valuable to use.
Or as Admiral Jellicoe put it, a naval commander would be a fool to
commit a battleship in battle unless he was certain of victory.
This was the
high watermark for the great ship. At
the end of the First World War, 118 battleships were in the service of thirteen
navies. By the start of the next war, a
generation later, the number of great ships had been reduced by half, even
though the battleship had grown to its maximum size and power.
While Jutland
was the last real battle between battleships, every country continued to build
them in the years between the wars. You
still had to have them, even if you couldn’t really use them. And while Admirals continued to argue for
larger and bigger ships, that were faster, longer, and carried more and larger
guns, the entire argument was becoming moot, since the newest method of
throwing things at sea—the airplane—was to soon prove the end of an era for
battleships.
When World War
II started, the supremacy of the airplane over the battleship was proven in two
early battles. At Taranto in 1940, and
at Pearl Harbor in 1941, airplanes easily destroyed the largest of the great
ships. The Bismarck was destroyed
by obsolete British biplanes. In 1945,
the largest and most powerful battleship every constructed, the Yamato,
was sunk from the air.
During the
entire Second World War, an exchange of fire between battleships on anything
close to the scale of Jutland—never occurred.
The decisive naval battles were fought across hundreds of miles between
aircraft carriers who never sighted each other.
Or as Admiral Cunningham said after the destruction of the Italian
battleships at Taranto, “Taranto….should be remembered forever as having shown
once and for all that in the Fleet Air Arm the Navy has its most devastating
weapon.”
Battleships did
play a role in the war, but were primarily used as escorts to invasion fleets
and to bombard coastal defenses. The
sixteen inch guns of the Iowa, for example, can fire a two thousand pound explosive shell 25 miles, devastating any
target.
Long after other
nations had permanently retire their battleships, only America periodically
used them. After President Reagan
reactivated the USS Iowa (right) and the USS Missouri, theirs
were the first guns to fire when the US retook Kuwait from Saddam Hussein. And for a little while, naval tacticians
argued that there was still a place in the modern navy for the great ship,
chiefly because it would be cheaper to renovate these ships than to build new
ones.
With new,
fin-stabilized rounds, the massive guns of the Iowa class battleships
are capable of hitting targets as far inland as 75 miles, putting over half the
world’s population within the range of their guns. Even today, no other weapon system yet
designed is capable of putting more tonnage of explosives on target as fast as,
or as accurately as, or for a more prolonged time, than a battleship
could.
Even in this
role, however, the ships are simply too big, too costly to operate, and require
too many skilled men to keep in action.
As a weapons delivery system—essentially still a platform from which to
throw things—there are other and more cost-effective methods.
Sadly, in the
day of the Exocet missile and in the day of an expensive drone capable of
sinking even a great ship, the day of the great battleship is truly over. For centuries there was a continual drive to
make the ships bigger, faster, and carrying bigger and more powerful
guns….until the day came when they could not be really used. The human race had, in effect, created a rock
it could not lift.
I wonder how long aircraft carriers will last if there is an all out conflict. They are great for projecting power against nations that don't have nukes and cruise missiles, but are they going to be too valuable to commit in battle against a similarly sophisticated navy. The Falklands showed how a small country like Argentina could pot even technically sophisticated warships belonging to nations like Britain.
ReplyDeleteWar is getting too dangerous for the leadership of aggressor nations, especially when their enemies can drop a telephone pole sized missile packed with explosives through the front window of the presidential palace.