For some rather
obvious reasons, I’ve been thinking about a man made extravagantly rich by his
dealings in real estate, who turned politician and eventually engaged
in military actions in Iran. No, I’m not thinking about President Trump. (Frequent readers should remember that not
only have I rarely mentioned any current president, but engaged in military
actions in Iran. No, I’m not thinking
about President usually steer from current politics for the simple reason that
the best tasting fruit grows higher in the tree.)
No, I was thinking
of Marcus Licinius Crassus, the wealthiest Roman politician and, some would
argue, the wealthiest man in history.
(Any list of the wealthiest people in history has to eliminate heads of
state, since theoretically they “own” their empires. Time Magazine, for example, once wrote that
the wealthiest man in history, at $4.6 trillion, was the Emperor Augustus
because he owned all of Egypt. How they
arrived at that figure is anyone’s guess.)
Crassus got his
start working for his father, a Roman consul.
When his father was appointed to be the governor of Spain, Crassus
accompanied him and was responsible for the operations of the silver mines that
his father acquired. That politicians
seem to magically acquire wealth is a truism that is millennia old.
At the death of
his father, Crassus inherited wealth—the exact amount is hard to determine, but
in today’s money, it is somewhere between $10 and $100 million. It is very difficult to compare monetary
units from antiquity to today, as earning potentials and prices of commodities
have changed so drastically that it is sort of like figuring out the square
root of blue. Let’s just say that the
amount of gold Crassus inherited would make him a rich man at any point in
human history.
Crassus was
ambitious and eager to not only increase his wealth, but also to be recognized
as a powerful politician. In Rome,
achieving this kind of power required a military background, regardless of your
wealth. When a civil war broke out in
the Roman Empire between Marius and Sulla, Crassus correctly predicted the winning
side, raising and equipping an army with his own funds and joining the forces
of Sulla. Though a private army sounds
strange by our standards today, it was a common practice even in early American
history. Such private militias fought on
both sides of the American Civil War, and if Theodore Roosevelt hadn’t raised
the volunteer regiment of Rough Riders to fight during the Spanish American
War, it is highly unlikely that he would ever have become president.
Crassus—and his
army—fought for Sulla, who once he was victorious took over the leadership of
Rome and promptly began punishing his enemies by publishing a proscription list
naming his political and military opponents.
If anyone listed was killed, his executor received a reward for his
service, while the property of the executed was seized by the state and
auctioned off to refill the Roman treasury.
Sulla turned over the proscription process to Crassus.
It is at this
point in our story, that Crassus becomes a real estate tycoon. First, to settle a few private vendettas, he
added a few names to the proscription list—notably those who were men of
property. Second, at the public
auctions, Crassus purchased slaves and real estate at bargain prices. You can easily imagine that other wealthy
people might have prudently decided against competing too vigorously in those
auctions for fear that they, too, might find themselves added to the
proscription list.
Crassus had a real
skill in recognizing the value of the men who worked for him, reminding me of
an old story—possibly apocryphal—about J.P. Morgan: When the famous
financier was asked what his most valuable asset was, the reporter probably
expected to hear about a bank, a railroad line, or possibly a factory.
Instead, Morgan answered, "My good men. Take away everything else, but
leave me my good men and in five years, I will have it all back."
In the case of
Crassus, there was very little chance that anyone would take away his good men,
as they were his slaves. Crassus not
only bought slaves with talents (particularly architects, stonemasons, and
carpenters), but he actively schooled his men, teaching them to read. Frequently, Crassus, himself, acted the role
of teacher for such classes.
Among his slaves,
Crassus raised a 500 man private firefighting force. Although the population of Rome was nearing a
million residents, the city lacked any municipal firefighting force. Since the majority of the inhabitants lived
in cramped high-rise vertical slums and everyone cooked over open fires, major
fires were a nightly occurrence. On the
first sound of an alarm, Crassus and his private fire brigade would rush to the
site and….calmly watch the building burn.
Crassus would
volunteer to buy the structure from the panicked owner at what were, quite
literally, fire sale prices. The owners
could either accept the paltry offer or continue to watch their investment go
up in smoke. Usually, the owners
accepted and Crassus would have his men put out the fire and begin making
repairs. Frequently, Crassus would then
rent the building to the former owner or tenants.
Such practices
were both legal and ruthless. It did not
take long before Crassus (pictured at left with a Roman combover haircut) was
not only the largest owner of real estate in Rome, but according some sources,
he owned over half the city.
The Civil War had
thinned the ranks of the Roman Senate, and many of the senators remaining were
resistant to Sulla’s heavy-handed changes, so Sulla expanded the Senate from
300 to 600 men, appointing 450 new senators to fill the vacancies. Senators were expected to live in suitable
houses with ample servants, both of which Crassus could happily provide at
bargain prices.
Now a wealthy man
with excellent political connections, Crassus began to loan money to impoverished
men of potential that he believed had a future in Roman politics, such as the
young Julius Caesar. These friendly
deals allowed Crassus to not only secure political favor, but help to protect
the vast wealth that he was amassing.
How wealthy was he
at this point? If you took just the
amount of gold that Crassus could have raised by liquidating his holdings, then
use today’s price as a measure, Crassus was worth somewhere between $2 and $10
billion dollars—which coincidentally, is roughly where Forbes Magazine
guesstimates the present worth of President Trump.
To cement his
political power, Crassus needed a military success. Though the initial slave revolt of Spartacus
was only 78 men, the repeated bungled Roman attempts to squash the revolt
brought an additional 120,000 rebels to join the former gladiator. By the time Crassus volunteered to lead an
army to stop the revolt, it was a crisis that threatened the empire. a small slave revolt had grown to what
historians call the Third Servile war.
(You know you have a problem with “the help” when you have to start
numbering the wars with them.)
In the early days
of the campaign, one of the Legions under Crassus bolted from the battle
field. Crassus solved this crucial
morale problem by reintroducing the old Roman custom of decimation. Of the 500 men who had fled from battle, he
divided them into ten groups of fifty, then by lottery, selected five men from
each group to be executed. While this
might have been harsh, it certainly improved discipline.
Note.
I wish this was a lesson that all the talking heads in media could
learn—decimate means to kill off one-tenth.
You cannot decimate a group of people to the last man as there are
always nine left. Perhaps if we
decimated a few news organizations they could remember that a tornado cannot
completely decimate a trailer park.
With careful
tactics and a newly inspired army, Crassus crushed the army of Spartacus,
killing most of the rebels while capturing 6000, who were crucified along the 350-mile
length of the Appian Way. With typical
Roman attention to detail, the crosses were evenly spaced, with 17 executed men
for each mile. No one knows whether
Spartacus was among the crucified or had perished in battle.
For his victory,
Crassus demanded a Roman triumph upon his return, but the Senate—wary of his
popularity—agreed only to a lesser ceremony, an “ovation”. Crassus agreed, then from his own pocket had
10,000 tables set up along the processional route, gifting the people with the
equivalent of enough food to feed the entire city for three months (effectively
turning an “ovation” into a massive political rally). In essence, he gave himself a triumph as
evidenced by his wearing the laurel wreath reserved for triumphs instead of the
traditional myrtle wreath used for ovations.
While the mainstream media—I mean Senate—hated it, the people of Rome
loved it.
Back in Rome,
Crassus funded the election of Julius Caesar to become the Pontifex
Maximus. As rivalry for leadership in
Rome continued, it was Caesar who fashioned the First Triumvirate in 60 BCE, in
which power was divided among Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus. For a while, this move even created a sort of
uneasy peace in Rome. Crassus, however,
believed he needed a bigger military victory to cement his position and used
his political clout to secure the governorship of Syria, making no secret that
once there, he intended to start a war with the Parthian Empire to the
East. (What was once the Parthian Empire
consists today of Iraq, Iran, and a chunk of Turkey).
That Crassus was
also after the gold of Parthia was no secret, nor was it a secret that there
was no pressing need for such a military invasion. Upon his arrival in Syria, Crassus promptly
led an army of 40,000 Roman soldiers over the Tigris River—an act that was
effectively a declaration of war.
There is no need
to describe in detail Crassus’ defeat at the Battle of Carrhae as there are
endless books about the subject. (I
recommend Sampsons’ Defeat of Rome in the East.) The biggest single
error was that Crassus expected the Parthians to fight like all of the other
enemies that Rome had vanquished, which is to say by a pitched infantry battle
fought in close combat. Though the
Romans outnumbered the Parthians four to one, the Parthians’ army consisted
entirely of cavalry, most of whom were archers.
The Parthians simply refused to engage the heavy Roman infantry, but
slowly destroyed their enemy at a distance with an inexhaustible supply of arrows. If the Romans rushed the cavalry units, the
Parthians would withdraw while turning almost 180 degrees in the saddle to
launch arrows at their pursuers, the infamous ‘Parthian Shot’.
Crassus failed
because he assumed his enemy would fight along traditional lines, and so he
died along with half of his men (another ten thousand were taken
prisoner). After the battle, the
Parthians supposedly poured molten gold through the mouth of the severed head
of Crassus to quench his thirst for gold.
In the end,
Crassus did get his triumph...in a way.
From among the survivors, the Parthians selected a Roman who resembled
Crassus to represent the fallen Roman leader.
Dressing him in women’s clothing and deploying a small army of
prostitutes as his soldiers, the Parthians paraded him through the streets of
Parthian towns, calling it the Triumph of Crassus.
Goes to show you that being a nation's beloved General doesn't exempt you from having a hellfire missile punched through the trunk of your Toyota.
ReplyDelete