Saturday, December 4, 2010

Don’t Ask About Honor, Either

The military has been discussing for years repealing 10 U.S. Code 654 (the “Don't Ask, Don't Tell” law) that would allow homosexuals to serve openly in the military.

It would seem to me that this question was settled a long time ago. Ignoring the Greek army in general and the entire Spartan army in particular, there is still the example of the Sacred Band of Thebes. These soldiers were 150 pairs of matched lovers who fought together as an elite unit. In combat, the army of Thebes always positioned the Sacred Band on their right flank, the position of honor. And on a warm day of August in 338 B.C., this is where they were positioned as they fought to save their city of Thebes from an invading army.

Philip II of Macedonia wanted to invade the Persian Empire to his east, but before he could mount such a hazardous expedition, he wanted to control all the quarrelsome city-states of central Greece to the south. In his youth, Philip had been a hostage in Thebes, and he had learned of the effectiveness of the army of Thebes, including the Sacred Band. When Philip returned to Macedonia, he made major changes to the fighting methods of the traditional hoplite army, changing weapons, formations, and increasing the role and size of the cavalry.

Now, his army was facing the combined armies of Thebes and Athens on the battlefield of Chaeronea, just outside the city of Thebes. Needing a commander of the vaunted Companion Cavalry he could trust, Philip gave command to his young son Alexander and positioned him directly in front of the Sacred Band.

While exact details of what happened during the battle are unclear, it seems certain that eventually Alexander and the Companion Cavalry broke through the line and carried the day. Thebes and Athens each lost over a thousand men and three times that number were captured. The heaviest fighting occurred around the Sacred Band, who fought to the last man. Philip, surveying their bodies lying out in array and noting that each lay facing the enemy, wept at the sight of such devoted and brave men.

Plutarch records that Philip II, on encountering the corpses "heaped one upon another", understanding who they were, exclaimed, “Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.”

Philip II did not live long enough to mount his expedition to the east, but his son Alexander went on to claim military victories as far east as India. Not long after his death, the people of Thebes erected a monument in the form of a stone lion at Chaeronea, at the grave of the Sacred Band. In the early 20th century the stone was restored and the graves excavated. 254 bodies in 7 rows were discovered; presumably the rest of the Sacred Band were wounded and captured.

It does not seem possible that anyone could seriously argue that homosexuals cannot make good soldiers. The argument today seems to be centered on the belief that allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the military would be disruptive to the rest of the military. So the military allowed a survey among the troops. 70% of the people serving in the military have indicated that the effects of such a change would be negligible.

The Secretary of Defense agrees. So does the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the head of the U.S. Navy. General Casey, the head of the U.S. Marines strongly disagrees. He has suggested that the military is not the place to conduct social experiments, and certainly not during a war.

I disagree. The military has always been among the first to try new technology, new methods, and yes, even to try social experiments during a time of war. While the British Navy was still pressing men into service to fight in their warships, our Revolutionary Navy allowed men to inspect a ship before volunteering. When the South was desperate for men during the Civil War, they would not allow their slaves to serve in the military. Yet in the North, 10% of the army were black men.

Long before there was any real form of integration in the enlisted society, both the US Navy and the Revenue Cutter Service (the predecessor of the Coast Guard) allowed integrated ships. In 1887, Captain Michael Healy became the first black captain of the Revenue Cutter ship. He retired from the service as the third highest officer in the service.

Embracing change and innovation, Philip II put together an army that his son used to conquer the known world. Maybe the time has finally come for even the Marines to try some changes.

I am proud of the United States Marines; I believe they can accomplish any mission given to them. I even think they are tough enough to allow every Marine to live his life without lying. The Marines are built around a code of honor, it is time they start extending that honor to each other.

Let us all look forward to the day when the head of the Marines, like Plutarch, can say, “Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly.”

5 comments:

  1. You are right about letting open homosexuals to join the army, even though the queer-expanding 21st. century is making that discussion obsolete, passe, humanly limited, and boring.

    I think that if that discussion really wants to be inclusive and conclusive, and keep up with our current times (so that our so/self-called "politicians" or "leaders" won't have to waste our tax money re-"discussing" it every 2 or 3 years), not only open homosexuals should be allowed in the army, but also open BISEXUALS (yes, Mr. and Mrs. BlackAndWhite: they DO exist), transgenders, crossdressers, etc, should be allowed in the army if they want to, and enlisted in the brigade they choose according to their "inner" identities. (They should be even allowed to change their gender/sexual decission whenever they feel that they have chosen wrongly, or exhausted all possibilites or simply got tired of it.)

    A friend of mine who is openly gay (well, let's face it, he is a flashy faggot and proud ot it) has decided to join the army. He liked your comment about letting army candidates inspect the "facilities" in advance before deciding... So he is currently visiting some ships in order to decide which one to join: he is checking out the dormitories, the baths, the beds, the hot showers, the back alleys and dark corners of the ships, the muzak played at long solitary nights at sea, of course, he is mostly checking his future comrades or bedmates (he definitely prefers race-"integrated" brigades, he is very multiculturalist and loves expanding himself to any new big and unexpected "other"). Anyway, I hope he will find that brave brigade whose members would honor each other handsomely and endlessly in all fights at sea, on land, in the air, on bed.

    On the other hand, another openly gay friend said that this anti-gay-army thing is great, especially in times of mandatory recruitment. He said, and I quote, "Let those straight guys fight to preserve our great Western freedoms." He's promised to honor them every time he joins his likes in the neighborhood gay bar, and want me to send them this message: "Fight bravely, and don't worry about your adolescent sons left behind... We'll take good care of them if you ever die defending what is ours."

    God bless y'all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perhaps the reason for the higher anxiety on the part of the Marines is linked to their long-term fascination with bright and colorful uniforms. The Marines have long been inordinately concerned with their fancy image, dressing up in the cutest outfits and waving their long and pointy swords in adorable displays of manly vigor. Maybe they just don't want to let on what goes on behind closed doors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The notion that homosexuals can't serve in armed forces because they make poor soldiers or are a "disruptive influence" is just plain wrong.
    I have served with openly gay soldiers, and they were neither disruptive or poor soldiers.
    I am proud to have marched with them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Isn't the AIDS issue a bit more of a concern now than it was back in the time of the Sacred Band?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Since Aids did not exist then, sure. But, HIV infection is a concern for everyone in and out of the military. And it should not be a bigger factor for those in the military than for those in the general public. If anything, an honest approach to human sexuality will make a wide variety of problems easier to deal with.

    ReplyDelete

Normally, I would never force comments to be moderated. However, in the last month, Russian hackers have added hundreds of bogus comments, most of which either talk about Ukraine or try to sell some crappy product. As soon as they stop, I'll turn this nonsense off.