The History
Channel will shortly air a new series about the birth of Texas and the rise of
Sam Houston, which evidently starts with the Alamo. I haven't seen the series yet, but if the
teaser ads are any indication, I am sure there are a few things they will not
tell you. Or perhaps, they may omit will
telling you the full story.
The Alamo
Battle Was Fought, In Part, Over Slavery
There were
no "Thirteen Days of Glory"
The Battle
Was Not a Costly Victory for the Mexicans.
The Alamo
Was Not an Important Fort
Some of the
Texas Heroes Are....Different!
There Were No
Survivors.
The Battle
Did Not Buy Time for Sam Houston
The Alamo
Battle Was Fought, In Part, Over Slavery
The Texans
were planting coastal cotton, a crop that relatively quickly depletes the soil
without the use of fertilizers, whose invention was more than a century in the
future. The easiest way for a planter to
get around this problem was just to move westward and acquire more inexpensive
land. Planters needed good soil close to
a river or creek to use for transporting the bulky cotton to the coast. Almost all of the land along the Gulf Coast
of Texas was perfect for growing cotton.
This type
of farming was not profitable without slavery.
The settlers needed slaves and in their original agreement with Mexico
encouraged them to bring in slaves as they migrated into Texas. They also swore allegiance to the Mexican
government and promised to convert to Catholicism. But, in 1829, Mexico outlawed slavery.
The Texans
appealed this, and got a short term exemption.
The slaves were converted over to indentured servants with a 10 year
contract that was signed for the slaves while they were still legally
slaves. (Cute lawyering is a Texas
tradition.) When the ten-year exemption
was up, the settlers didn't want to give up the roughly 5,000 slaves already in
Texas (20% of the new immigrant population) and were trying to get a longer
exemption, but Mexico refused.
While the
battle at the Alamo was being fought, Stephen Austin was in Mexico trying to
get that extension—if he had been successful, there probably would not have
been a fight at the Alamo.
Slavery
wasn't the only issue between the Anglo settlers and Mexico, but it was only
issue that couldn't be compromised or resolved.
In many ways, this was a precursor to the American Civil War.
There were
no "Thirteen Days of Glory"
When Santa
Ana's army reached San Antonio in February, the defenders were shocked,
believing it would take far longer for the Mexican Army to arrive. (Santa Ana was a better general than is
commonly believed.)
As soon as
he arrived in Bexar, Santa Ana put a loose guard around the Alamo and waited
while the rest of his forces arrived.
This would take two weeks, and while he waited, Santa Ana met and
married a beautiful local girl, Melchora Barrera. (Well, kind of married her—the priest was
actually a lieutenant in his army who had faked more than one wedding for the
general. After the honeymoon, his “wife”
would learn the truth and end up the mistress of one of his junior
officers. No one ever said that Santa
Ana was a nice guy.)
According
to most historians, during the time it took for the army to arrive—those
"Thirteen Days of Glory"—not a single defender of the Alamo died
until the morning of the final attack. There was little fighting and no effective
bombardment of the fort. The largest
pieces of Mexican artillery were the last of Santa Ana's units to arrive, and
by the time they reached Bexar, the Alamo had fallen.
The Battle
Was Not a Costly Victory for the Mexicans.
There is a
general rule of thumb in military battles: the defenders have a 3:1
advantage. If there are a thousand
defenders, you need at least 3000 men to attack. Following this rule, the 180-250 (estimates
vary endlessly) defenders of the Alamo should have killed far more than the
450-600 Mexicans believed to have been killed during the battle. A casualty ratio of 2:1 is considered fairly
low for the defenders of a fort.
As Santa
Ana said, “What are the lives of soldiers than so many chickens? I tell you,
the Alamo must fall, and my orders must be obeyed at all hazards. If our
soldiers are driven back, the next line in their rear must force those before
them forward, and compel them to scale the walls, cost what it may."
Actually,
the Mexican army almost reached the wall during the early morning attack
without an alarm being raised. The
Mexican reports show that the Texas guards were asleep. The first attack was successful and the
battle was over in just a few hours.
The Alamo
Was Not an Important Fort
Actually,
Sam Houston wanted to destroy the fort, but was prevented from doing so by
Governor Henry Smith. The damn fort was
not in a strategic location and was far too large for the number of men present
to guard it. This was precisely why the
Texans were able to take it away in 1835 from General Cos—who went to Mexico
and came back with Santa Ana and enough men to take it back.
With the
few men Travis and Bowie had under their command, they could not adequately
defend the walls and still man their cannons—nor had they used their time
wisely while waiting for the Mexican Army to arrive. There were several weak points in the wall
that almost could not be defended. And
no preparation for feeding the men had been made until February 23—the date the
Mexican Army arrived.
If Travis
had burned the fort and joined up with the men at Goliad, this would have added
about 700 additional men for General Houston, an incredibly valuable addition.
Some of the
Texas Heroes Are....Different!
Sam Houston
resigned as Governor of Tennessee after his wife left him—shortly after the
wedding. For years, there were strange
rumors of alcoholism and infidelity.
During this time, Houston met Congressman William Stanbery while walking
on Pennsylvania Avenue. Since Stanberry
had recently publicly accused Houston of fraud, Houston beat the congressman to
the ground with his hickory cane. Though
the congressman tried to shoot Houston with a pistol, the former governor
escaped when the gun misfired. Despite
being defended by no less a lawyer than Francis Scott Key, Houston was fined
$500 in damages, but left for Texas without paying.
Jim Bowie
was a criminal wanted in America for illegal slave trading and in Mexico for
land swindles. If he had survived the
Alamo, he would probably have spent the rest of his days in prison.
Jim Bowie
was already famous for a spectacularly crazy battle called the Sandbar Duel. He, and at least 5 other men, had variously
shot, stabbed, and cut each other until the fight was over, by which time Bowie
had been shot at least twice and stabbed six times. This kind of lunacy made him, and his large
knife, famous (or infamous).
David
Crockett had just been voted out of Congress, and was looking for a small pond
in need of a big, albeit second-hand, frog.
Before leaving Tennessee, he wrote to friends encouraging them to move
with him to Texas “if Van Buren were elected President.” Van Buren was, and Crocket did, along with 30
friends.
When
William Barrett Travis arrived in Texas, he was running away from a failed
marriage, mounting debts for which he was about to be arrested, and two
children when he came to Texas. At least
one historian has put forth the theory that Travis was insane as a result of
drinking mercury in a failed effort to treat his venereal disease. Somehow, he had accomplished all of the above
relatively quickly—he was only 26 years old when he died at the Alamo.
There Were No
Survivors.
Well, yes
and no. None of the men who fought
survived. While there is scant evidence
that a handful of men, including David Crockett, were taken prisoner during the
fighting, if so, none were allowed to live long. While General Cos did not believe in
executing prisoners, and argued for mercy at both the Alamo and later at
Goliad, General Santa Ana insisted that Mexican law, which labeled the
defenders of the Alamo as pirates, be enforced.
There were
certainly survivors. Nearly twenty women,
children, and slaves did survive the siege of the Alamo and were allowed to
return home. The best known of these
were Susanna Dickinson and Joe, the slave/indentured servant of William Barrett
Travis.
The Battle
Did Not Buy Time for Sam Houston
First, the
battle did not delay Santa Ana any significant amount of time.
Second, for
most of the time during the actual battle, Sam Houston was on leave from the
army, which existed mainly in theory, anyway.
During this time, he took care of personal business, negotiated with the
Cherokee Indians, and was a delegate to the Texas Constitutional
Conventions. Houston did not return to
the army until March 6, the same day the Alamo fell.
Now in
command of a small, but growing, army, Sam Houston planned to lead Santa Ana
ever closer to the Louisiana border, where an American army was waiting, just
across the Sabine River. While
Washington debated the wisdom of adding more slave territory to the Union, the
army was waiting on the border to implement whatever policy the politicians
finally agreed upon. If Houston could
somehow create a conflict between Mexico and America, Texas would gain a
powerful supporter in the latter.
Sam Houston
knew his army was what were at the time called irregulars, meaning an
undisciplined and untrained force.
Houston knew that he could probably get, at most, one good fight out of
them before they deserted and went back to their families. Knowing their true
worth, he was not about to risk the future of Texas by actually using the army
unless he had to.
Santa Ana
had almost forced Houston to strike by dividing his army twice while pursuing
the Texan army over the 45 days after the fall of the Alamo. Then, suddenly, on April 21, 1836, Sam
Houston realized his chance and attacked the sleeping army of Santa Ana at San
Jacinto. In a battle that lasted
eighteen minutes, Houston had done the impossible, securing Texas Independence.
But I'm
pretty sure the TV show will tell you that.
Having lived in San Antonio (de Valero) for 20 years, I assure you that this is NOT the history that we learned! Everyone knows that the Alamo is the "Shrine of Texas Liberty" was defended by brave souls who only wanted to be free from Mexico. History is a funny beast. Someone once said "History is written by the winners". The Alamo story we all "know" is more like not letting facts get in the way of truth! Thanks for adding some FACTS to the story!
ReplyDeleteOne things Texans are good at is spinning a story. It's our great gift and in many ways is one of the keys to Texas success. Sam Houston was a particular bastard and despite his noble stand in opposing secession, he pulled some dumb stunts as governor. One of the most telling was his persecution of the Texas Navy, a military force both remarkable for its effectiveness given its small size and likely were the most responsible for keeping Santa Anna from being reinforced by sea and handing him his keister at San Jacinto. The Texas Navy was also responsible for the only recorded defeat (or at least the forcing of a retreat) of a pair of state-of-the-art steam battleships by sail-rigged Texas Navy and Republic of Yucatan warships at the sea Battle of Campeche, an action for which, Sam Houston, who hated the navy for some reason, court-martialed Commodore Edwin Moore for disobeying orders. He was acquited, a verdict which enraged Houston, but, hey, Texans love a winner and Moore's Texas Navy did some amazing things for such a tiny force. I used to fly a Texas Navy pennant on my Hobie Cat. My wife wouldn't let me mount a potato cannon as a stern chaser. She's a terrible spoil-sport.
ReplyDeleteHere's the info about the Battle of Campeche. The battle was 7 ships (including two steam battleships) against 5 sailing vessels of the Texas/Yucatan coalition.
Might be a fun story to tell.
Tom
Sorry, here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Battle_of_Campeche
ReplyDeleteActually in the second leg of the battle, they were up against two ironclad steamers and a wooden steamer, two brigs and two schooners. The Yucatan Navy was two schooners and 5 little gunboats.The Texans under Moore fought the British crewed and officered Mexican navy to a standstill much to the embarrassment of the Brits. Having fought the ironclad Mexican steamships essentially to a draw using only wooden sailing ships was an achievement for Commodore Moore, the Naval Battle of Campeche becoming the only naval battle in world history in which sailing ships held their own against steam-powered ships in combat.
ReplyDeleteAnd the Mexican ships mounted Paixan guns throwing explosive shells while the Texans fired mostly round shot. One-sided, but the Texans fought them toe to toe and made them retreat. That's the kind of stories Texans like to tell around the campfire. Hell, we'll even give Sam Houston a kindly spin for the sake of a good story.
ReplyDelete