Voter
fraud is in the news again. It seems
that several models of electronic voting machines are susceptible to being
hacked, perhaps throwing the election to the other unqualified and much
despised candidate. While this is not
really the topic that I want to discuss, I do have a suggestion: Unplug the machines from the internet and
manually add up the reports from each machine.
Tallying the final results will take longer, but trust me, this is not
an election where anybody is desperate to hear the results.
There
is all kinds of voter fraud. In 2004,
Florida determined that at least 100,000 of its registered voters were also
registered to vote in other states (chiefly the states of New York and
Georgia). While it proved impossible to get
an exact number, the states cooperated and determined that some voters had
indeed registered in both states. And
for decades, the number of registered voters in Mississippi exceeded the state’s
population. Today, it is estimated that
1.8 million deceased people are registered to vote in the upcoming election.
And
just a few minutes ago, I heard of a new—and weird—form of voter fraud. Several states have such a lengthy early
voting period, that by the time this blog post is online, voting will have already
started in several states. The problem
is that--regardless of when you vote--you must be alive on Election Day for
your vote to be valid. And with an early
voting period of two months, there are a predictable number of people who won’t
still be around on Election Day.
Personally,
I don’t think that any of this adds up to a significant number, and I’m not
worried about it. When you get right
down to it, I’m not worried about any form of voter fraud: I just do not
believe that it is a significant problem.
This is a leap of faith for a Texan; in the Lone Star State, as I was growing up, I
was heavily steeped in the lore of “Landslide Lyndon” and
a few of his friends. El Paso once had
an election in which the number of votes cast was three times
the number of registered voters!
While
I am sure there are still isolated cases of voter fraud, they probably do not
favor any one political party, but rather, statistically cancel each other out. (Of course, if it is done well, you will
never know the voter fraud occurred.)
The
problem is that quite a few people are convinced that voter fraud actually
is a problem. There is
not much in the way of proof available, but that is not the problem. If people actually believe that American
elections are in any way corrupted, then we do indeed have a problem.
Every
American should have the right to believe that his vote is important and that
his vote matters. Today, the issued that
probably upsets the most voters, however, is not how much voter fraud might be
occurring, but the issue of voter identification.
Somehow,
this issue has deeply divided this country.
While you have to show an ID to board a plane, check out a library book,
or buy pain or cold medication from a pharmacy, in almost half the states of
the US, no identification is necessary at the polls.
I
understand the arguments against voter ID, and at least part of me
agrees. I don’t like showing an ID, and
perhaps getting an ID might put a hardship on some people, but I thought I
might share a little information on the subject that I found surprising.
Mexico
has required a government-issued ID card since the 1990’s. And Mexico adopted the cards for a simple
reason: their citizens no longer
believed their elections were fair and honest.
Mexico had a long tradition of electoral crooks known as Mapaches, or raccoons, who went about stuffing and
stealing ballot boxes. The new ID has been widely accepted by the
citizens and helped foster a feeling that democracy works in the country.
Interestingly, several Latin American
countries started using voter ID as a means of insuring that the votes of
minorities were included. This view is
polar opposite of what many who oppose voter ID in the United States believe.
As far as I have checked, every country in
North and South America requires an ID of some form, with a photo. The only country that does not is the United
States, where thirty-three states have some form of identification
requirement. The laws in five of these
states are being challenged in federal court.
In several countries, Argentina is an example,
voting is mandatory. When you vote, a
notation is made on your ID card. If a
policeman examines your card and notices that you did not vote, you can be
fined. The system is not perfect,
especially in poorer countries. The poor
in countries like Bolivia have a difficult time establishing their identity,
but the country is making progress in fixing this problem.
Not only does all of Europe require an identification card to vote, but
it seems to be true all over the world.
In the entire world, the only country I can find, other than the United States, that does not require an
identification card before you can vote is the Philippines. If you are voting there, you do not have to
show an ID, unless an election official asks to see it.
I found a few countries that would allow
provisional voting without an ID, giving you time later to prove
citizenship. And several countries would
allow two or more citizens with proper identification to sign an affidavit
testifying citizenship for a third party.
But, I found no country that would allow people to vote without a form
of identification.
Other than United States.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think some of the ID problem may be the cost of identification. In Washington state, a state-issued ID card (not a driver's license) costs better than $60 not including the 4 hour trip to the DMV. In a way, me having to have an ID would be like a kind of poll tax that would keep out the folk on fixed incomes who don't drive anymore. I think if they were to require ID to vote, they should make basic ID's, the sort you need for voting, free to citizens of the state. Of course that would cut into a form of taxation and when have you ever heard of a state willingly giving up a way to gouge people for money?
ReplyDeleteYeah, me neither.
Tom