The chance that a sitting president will run for reelection is almost a dead certainty. The chances that he will win reelection, using history as a guide, are better than even. The chance that a president will seek reelection only to be denied the opportunity to do so by his party is remote. If history is a guide, a sitting president, regardless of his lack of popularity, can almost always count on his party’s nomination. Almost.
Note.
Obviously, I’m referring to President Biden’s apparent desire to run for
another term in 2024—a move that many in his own party now seem to oppose. To be fair, I suppose that I should disclose
that in the last presidential election, I did not support either of the two
dominant parties’ candidates. The
following had nothing to do with President Biden and is just my feeble attempt to
provide historical context to current events.
Any president
is considered to be the head of his political party, and as such, wields
enormous power and influence over the rest of the party membership. Through political favors, campaign
assistance, and most importantly, by control of the party’s sizeable campaign
funds, a president can reward his supporters and punish disloyal party members,
easily insuring sufficient support to insure his party’s nomination for a
second term.
Sometimes,
however, it just doesn’t work.
The exception
to all this party nonsense was George Washington, who had the good sense to run
for office before the development of political parties. His successor, John Adams was not quite so
fortunate. When Adams ran for reelection
in 1800, the two parties immediately began a campaign so incredibly
dirty—claims of insanity, treason, marital infidelity, serial bedwetting, etc.,
etc.—that it has become the norm for
every campaign since. Despite the
fighting between the parties, Adams wanted the support of the Federal Party for
a second term and his party supported him.
The first
sitting president to fail to receive his party’s nomination for reelection was
Franklin Pierce. Elected in 1852,
Pierce’s presidency literally derailed even before his inauguration. Traveling from Boston after the election, the
railroad car containing the president-elect, his wife, and their 11-year-old
son Benny, leapt from the track, rolling down an embankment. Before his parents’ horrified eyes, the boy
was crushed and nearly decapitated.
Pierce, obviously suffering from prolonged depression, never really
recovered, and the First Lady publicly wondered if the accident was divine
punishment for the sin of hubris. The
four years of the Pierce administration were more of a continual wake than an
active presidency.
Though
unpopular with voters, President Pierce still expected to run again in 1856 and
sought his party’s nomination. The other
two popular candidates within the Democratic Party, James Buchanan and Stephen
Douglas, forged an agreement where Buchanan would get the nomination in 1856
and Douglas would run in 1860. By
pooling their support, Pierce was denied the chance to run for reelection.
In 1868,
President Andrew Johnson tried to secure the Democratic nomination, but this
was almost impossible. Johnson had
served as Vice-President to Republican Abraham Lincoln, who had selected the
Southern Democrat as a measure to unify a nation embroiled in the Civil War. While Johnson was popular with Southern Whites,
he was extremely unpopular in the North.
On the 22nd ballot, the Democratic Party selected Horatio
Seymour, a New Yorker, while Johnson received only four ballots—those of the
delegates from his home state of Tennessee.
Chester A.
Arthur became president after the assassination of James Garfield, at a time
when the Republican Party had split into two rival camps. Arthur had been chosen for the post of
Vice-President primarily because he was a centrist, a compromise
candidate. As president, Arthur tried to
win the support of both camps, and might have been successful had not the news
of his medical condition become public knowledge. Suffering from Bright’s disease (called
nephritis today), Arthur appeared weak and his party gave the nomination to
James Blaine. When Blaine lost the
election to Grover Cleveland, he blamed the loss on Arthur’s refusal to support
his campaign.
The most
contentious Party fight was for the Republican candidacy for the 1912
election. President Theodore Roosevelt
had selected William Howard Taft to be his replacement in 1908, and Taft’s
victory had been largely been due to Roosevelt’s endorsement and tireless
campaigning. After leaving office,
Roosevelt had spent 18 months traveling outside the United States with no communication
with the new president. Upon Roosevelt’s
return, he found that Taft had abandoned many of Roosevelt’s Progressive
policies. As Republicans across the
country began to urge the former president to run in 1912, Roosevelt announced
that the tradition of presidents serving only two terms—a tradition begun by
George Washington—only applied to two consecutive
terms.
The rift
between the two men might have been avoided if Archibald Butt, a Republican
leader who had served in the administrations of both Roosevelt and Taft not
perished on April 15, 1912, with the sinking of the Titanic. Without Butt, there
was no one to broker a compromise between the two presidents.
Theodore
Roosevelt, believing—mostly correctly—that the nomination had been stolen from
both him and the voters by deceitful maneuvering of Taft and the convention
president, bolted the Republican Party, forming the Progressive Party (informally
known as the Bull Moose Party). The
Democrats ran Woodrow Wilson.
Taft never
really stood a chance of being reelected, due to party defections to Roosevelt,
and the sitting president wasn’t even on the ballots in California and South
Dakota. Taft received 23% of the vote,
Roosevelt received 27%, and Wilson won with 42% of the vote. Without a doubt, had either Taft or Roosevelt
bowed out of the election, the remaining Republican candidate would have
defeated Woodrow Wilson.
There is no
better teacher than witnessing utter failure, so since 1912, both political
parties have refrained from allowing party arguments creation of third
parties. (Ross Perot’s Reform Party in
1996 wasn’t really a spinoff from the Republican Party, but it did probably
allow Bill Clinton to defeat George Bush.)
While a few party members have wished to steal the nomination from an
incumbent president (like Ted Kennedy in 1980), no political party has ever
allowed such a challenge to actually prevent a president to run for reelection
since 1892.
Will 2024 be the year that breaks that tradition?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Normally, I would never force comments to be moderated. However, in the last month, Russian hackers have added hundreds of bogus comments, most of which either talk about Ukraine or try to sell some crappy product. As soon as they stop, I'll turn this nonsense off.