It seems that Enema U is not the only university run by
lemmings who regularly manufacture mountains of fear from molehills of
facts. The President of the University
of Delaware has declared a campus emergency—someone left rope nooses hanging
from trees.
"We will not tolerate this hate crime!" thundered President Taggert. "We must all stand together against intolerance."
(What is the proper plural collective
noun for a noose? Nooses sounds
absurd. Say it out loud and you'll see
what I mean. It is absolutely impossible
to say 'nooses' ten times as fast as you can.)
"We will not tolerate this hate crime!" thundered President Taggert. "We must all stand together against intolerance."
This statement was probably the very first clue that something
was wrong. First, when someone says,
"We should all stand together," you should immediately sit down
firmly on your wallet. A contrarian by
nature, I firmly believe the wisdom of the masses is a pernicious falsehood on
a scale that would intimidate organized religion. If the collective opinions of the great
unwashed were valid, then the finest newspaper in the world would be National
Enquirer, the finest beer would be Bud Light, and Congress would deserve to be
reelected.
Always run in the opposite direction of the crowd: If nothing else, you will avoid traffic jams.
Second, can we all just back off a little on the "hate
speech"/"hate crime" labels?
There is no right to be protected from being offended—even deeply offended. Inoffensive speech does not need
protection. You can go to the most
regulated and controlled areas of the world—even San Francisco—and praise the
local governmental leaders and no one will bother you. If you do not protect offensive speech—even
hateful speech—you are not protecting any speech at all.
The campus hate crime was discovered just hours after a
university sponsored protest by the Black Lives Matter group had ended on
campus. This led several students to
speculate on the school's website that the nooses (nuces?) were an obvious
reference to Southern Jim Crow laws and KKK lynchings.
Sure enough, shortly after President Taggert went on television
denouncing the hate crime, and shortly
after the campus police announced they were launching an investigation (this
probably meant questioning every student from Mississippi), it was determined
that the nooses (Neesi? Noosi?) were
actually the remains of paper lanterns that had gotten a little
wet in the rain. To be fair, it was
a hate-filled rain that came up from the south.
And the paper lanterns were made in Southern China.
Why had so many people looked at the remains of wet paper lanterns
and leaped to the wild conclusion about racial hate crimes?
This kind of reminds me of the Great Satanic Site in New
Mexico. This is not something tourists
will find on the map, even though it is still there.
It was 1990, and a utility worker stumbled across a large
geometric pattern of old tires, laid out in the desert scrub. The design, almost 500 feet on each side,
included three hexagrams, each with a seven tire dot in the center. The three hexagrams were connected by five
lines of tires—altogether, the design used over 450 tires!
A local police officer, who lectured to area high schools about
the seductive dangers of Satanism, warned that the area was obviously in use by
local practitioners of witchcraft.
"I'd stay away from the area if any people are around," he
said to reporters. "They'll hurt
you."
The Associated Press interviewed several experts. An expert on symbolism agreed that the symbol
was connected to witchcraft, and added that it was obviously connected to a
moon cult. A promoter of psychic affairs
testified that the steel-belted desert pattern was "a powerful and
spiritual symbol."
By this point, TireHenge had been on the front pages of the local
papers for almost a week and featured such details as aerial photographs—and
the rather grisly discovery of mounds of chicken bones: the obvious result of ritualistic sacrifices!
Just as the site was becoming the subject of sermons by
local pastors, a large number of rather sheepish men—most of them very
prominent in civic and social affairs—stepped forward and admitted
responsibility for the design. The
design was the layout for a three-way soccer match. (This is in NO WAY connected to what I wrote about two weeks ago!)
The first game was—I swear!
I'm not making this up!—the Albuquerque Police Department, the Fire
Department, and the Parks Department.
The mayor was one of the players.
When asked why it took them so long to come forward, one of the
players said, "From what was being printed, we didn't recognize ourselves."
This is exactly the point:
Any act, speech, or behavior can be labeled as evil, deviant, or
hate-filled by someone else—someone who is looking for evil in it. If we allow those in power to label our
actions, then it won't take long for the politically incorrect speech—the
uncomfortable speech—to equal a "hate crime". Label something as hate, racism, or prejudice
and even those involved won't recognize themselves.
Oh, yes!—and those chicken bones? They came from that well-known practitioner
of the Dark Arts—Colonel Sanders.
I like the term "contrarian", otherwise someone with a disdain for the wisdom of the masses might be called an "elitist" which actually, I am not. I believe in the ability of "the masses" to handle their own business. I think a whole lot of people of average intelligence working on their local stuff works out to be a lot more effective than a few people of college president intelligence running things from 2000 miles away.
ReplyDeleteThe Marxists are right. The "masses" want someone to tell them what to do and they feel more comfortable doing what everyone else is doing. Individualists (i.e. contrarians) on the other hand, don't give a rat's tukas what his neighbor is up to so long as his neighbor minds his own business and doesn't take it upon himself to tell the individualist what to do. When others try to tell them what to do, individualists morph almost instantly into contrarians. I think I'm going to get that on a T-Shirt.