It sounds
childish and naive today, but there once was a time not that long ago when most
people generally believed and trusted their government. The notion that elected officials would
actually lie to the public would have been rejected by almost everyone.
I'm not sure,
but perhaps this was because—to my generation, the postwar baby boom generation—the
government was run by the Greatest Generation:
the people who had defeated the Nazis in World War II. It was a generation that was easier to trust.
On more than a
few occasions, I have teased Professor Grumbles for his ignorance of
economics. A movie enthusiast, all the
good professor knows about economics is what he picked up from watching Frank
Capra movies: a fantasy world where all the
business men are evil Mr. Potters and banks exist only to cheat the working man
and to foreclose on widows and orphans.
Truthfully, in
my own way, I am just as guilty as Professor Grumbles, for while I know better,
I still want to believe that every politician is Mr. Smith Goes to
Washington. I want to believe that no
matter how corrupt the candidate, once the election is over, the weight and
importance of the job will descend upon the newly-elected and a change will
take place whereby he becomes worthy of the high ideals I want to believe exist—if
only because they are the things worth believing in.
Unfortunately
for me, it was difficult to live through the Sixties and hold on to such
childish notions. Even for a poor dumb
ol' country boy, it was hard to escape reality during a decade that was all but
engineered to be the end of innocence.
Whether it was the Vietnam War, the Peace Movement, or an increasingly
aggressive press, this was the generation that became all too aware of what the
nightly news called the "Credibility Gap."
As a child, I
must have been dumb as a post, for I think I was the last teenager in America
to realize the truth, but eventually, even I wised up. One day in school, there was a mandatory
viewing of a drug film—part of the endless campaign against the evils of
marijuana. I wish I could remember the
name of the film, but the plot was easy to follow. A sailor fell in with evil companions while on
shore leave and smoked a dreaded marijuana cigarette. Months later, the sailor was back on duty
aboard an aircraft carrier, where his job was to help provide radar data so
planes 9could safely land. During a
violent storm and at a crucial moment, the sailor suddenly experienced the
dreaded marijuana flashback, resulting in the fatal crash of the fighter
plane onto the deck of the carrier.
All over the
room, people suddenly sat up and looked at each other—a marijuana flashback? A twofer? How do you get two hits for the price of one
joint? Hell, at that point, I had never
tried marijuana, but even I knew that was bullshit.
For me, that was
the first crack in the dam. Once I
started doubting, however, it wasn't long until I began to doubt everything
in government. By the time Watergate was
over, I was the full-fledged curmudgeon who writes this blog today.
There was one
last attempt by the young, in 1972, to reestablish ideals. The youth of America helped select a
Democratic candidate who, in retrospect, could not possibly be elected. Their enthusiasm highjacked the primary
process and dismayed the party regulars who, after suffering a major defeat,
changed the delegate selection rules to insure that such political antics would
be impossible in the future, thus guaranteeing that elections would be far from
free and far "better" controlled.
This was a
painful lesson for the country to learn, and the generation that lived through
this period was changed forever. The
very idea of believing in an honest government became standard fodder for
talk-show comedians. A new, and far more
cynical age, was upon us.
And politicians
did their best to perpetuate the loss of trust.
In swift order we had presidents who, though they promised not to lie,
swore they couldn't remember details under oath, or lied to grand juries. And no one expected anything different from
them: they were simply validating what
we already believed about them.
Which brings us
to this election cycle. Once again, a
disaffected youth vote selected a presidential candidate who, though perhaps
unelectable, nevertheless reflected ideals that were worth believing in, even
it they were both naive and impractical.
Millions flocked to support a candidate for the first time in their
lives..and the rules established forty-four years ago immediately stopped this
campaign cold.
Millions of
voters learned that the election was rigged, that winning the most votes didn't
necessarily produce the most delegates,
and that the entire process was a sham.
A candidate favored by the status quo has been selected—regardless of
the will of the people. Though there is
ample proof of the effort to subvert an election, no one currently is facing
criminal charges.
Once again, an
entire generation has been taught that being idealistic and naively
innocent carries the high price of
disillusionment. Another generation has
been taught to distrust both our government—and those who aspire to run it.
The old saw, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely," is actually untrue. One can point to noble individuals who have taken up the leadership of our country without allowing himself to be corrupted. The most recent example I can think of is Jack Ryan, president of the U.S. in several of the best of Tom Clancy's novels.
ReplyDeletePower does not corrupt so much as it attracts the corruptible. The reason we aren't governed by better quality people, is that better quality (i.e. incorruptible)people have no interestin wielding power over others.
Therefore, so long as we keep creating top heavy government models, we're going to have corrupt, smarmy people clawing their way up the ladder to seize that power for themselves (see the 2016 presidential nominees).
I'm starting to worry about you Mark. Are you sure you've got tenure? How secure is your job. I know it's a university, but there are lines you probably shouldn't cross - non-progressive agenda truth telling being possibly the most dangerous line to cross. I recommend immersing any unexpected parcels you receive in the coming weeks into a tub of water before asking the bomb squad to unwrap it for you.
Or you could buy a robot for that purpose.
Good luck, my friend.
Tom King