Mexico has long
had a love/hate relationship with France.
Most people are aware that the French invaded Mexico in the 1860's and
imposed a puppet monarchy, which resulted in a lengthy and bloody war before
Mexico eventually regained its independence.
Less well known is that there was actually an earlier violent French
invasion, known as the Pastry War.
After gaining
its independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico was far from stable: in its first twenty years, there were twenty
presidents—most of whom seized power by force.
Additionally, every new president faced the same hurdle—raising enough
money to pay the army that had brought him to power,
In one year
(1800), Mexico produced prodigious amounts of silver—so much so that Mexico was
the economic engine that ran the Spanish Empire—but during the decades of wars
for independence, the men had been pulled from the mines to fight. The abandoned mines quickly flooded and caved
in. It was almost a century before the
mines regained the production levels they had reached during colonial times.
Note.
A visitor from another planet comparing the two dominant countries of
North America would have easily predicted which country was destined for
greatness. Possessing great natural
resources, vastly larger in territory, one country was clearly more
advanced. Her cities were much larger,
had more cultural amenities, and a more integrated society. Mexico was clearly ahead, and when you
factored in the slaves of the United States, had a higher per capita
income. Unfortunately, independence
brought stagnation and decay to Mexico.
Less than 50 years later, Mexico lagged far behind the United States.
Desperate for
cash, most of the incoming presidents were forced to use the same sources of
revenue: forcing loans from the wealthy elite of Mexico—especially foreigners
still residing in the country.
Naturally, these loans were almost never repaid. These individuals would protest to their
respective governments, who in turn, would protest to the Mexican government
and demand repayment. Unfortunately,
constantly changing administrations, fluctuating exchange rates, and a chronic
shortage of funds in the Mexican treasury meant these claims were rarely
settled.
In 1828, the
shop of a French baker, Remontel, in Mexico City was emptied by the hungry
Mexican Army. Remontel protested to King
Louis Philippe of France, who demanded 600,000 pesos in repayment. Today, this is a meaningless number, but take
my word for it: the French King was
asking for a vast fortune. The average
daily wage in Mexico at that time was no more than a single peso per day. They must have been really good French
pastries.
The claim, of
course, was not settled. In the interim,
Mexico had another series of presidents, including Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana,
who—after defeating the defenders of the Alamo—had lost Texas at the Battle of
San Jacinto: Mexico was hardly in the
position to repay any of her debts.
In 1838, the
French King issued an ultimatum: either
Mexico would pay her debts, or France would take military steps to enforce
repayment. During their early years,
most Latin American countries derived their tax revenues almost exclusively
from import duties collected at port cities.
Foreign countries, seeking to recover debts, could simply seize port
cities and confiscate tax revenues until the debt was recovered.
Seizing ports
and tax revenues evolved into a convenient excuse for European countries to
attempt to seize New World countries.
This was the same excuse France used when it imposed Maximilian on
Mexico a generation later. In 1916, the
United States seized the customs houses of the Dominican Republic to preempt
European countries from doing the same thing.
For decades, the US Marines collected import taxes, dividing the revenue
between debt repayment and tax revenue for the island nation. While the Dominicans were unhappy about the
occupation, they did note that the half revenue they received was substantially
more revenue than they had received when their own people had run the customs
houses, themselves.
When Mexico
still refused to settle the debt, France sent a fleet to capture Veracruz,
Mexico's main port. The port was
protected by a massive fortress, San Juan de Alua, on an island in the harbor. An imposing structure, it had withstood
pirate attacks for centuries.
Unfortunately, this was a different age and the fortress was no match
for the modern artillery of the French fleet.
The fleet's exploding artillery rounds quickly ignited the fortress' magazines,
making the attack one of the first examples of the futility of stone forts
against naval gunnery—which was noticed by military leaders around the world.
France rather
quickly captured the entire Mexican navy, bottled up all the ports, and cut off
all trade in and out of Mexico while it demanded repayment of the debts. Mexico tried to smuggle goods into the
country, and was forced to land ships as far away as Corpus Christi, Texas and
bring the goods overland.
In the battles
of Veracruz, Santa Ana returned from retirement, becoming something of a hero
after he was wounded and lost his left leg after having his horse shot out from
under him. This set the stage for his
role in the Mexican-American War, just seven years later.
Eventually, both
sides tired of the conflict, so Mexico agreed to pay the 600,000 pesos and
France agreed to stop the embargo.
Naturally, Mexico borrowed the funds.
And now we see where this all started. Actually Donald Trump should get along with the Mexicans really well. He too built his empire with "other people's money". I'm sure they could quickly reach a deal on immigration that neither one of them would honor and both would tell their people that they had come out the better on. Isn't that how winners do things?
ReplyDelete