-->
Any good history
book will tell you the Aztec empire vanished in 1521 when Cortés destroyed
Tenochtitlan, its capital city. And I do
mean destroyed—the last time a city was dismantled so effectively, the Romans
were doing a little urban renewal in Carthage.
The empire was
destroyed, but the people remained and today over 1.5
million people still speak Nahuatl—the language of the Aztecs—as their primary
language. Most of these descendants of
mighty warriors still live in Central and South Mexico.
The fact that
there are roughly as many Aztecs today as there were five centuries ago makes a
story about the last Aztecs a
little…. weird. Almost blog like.
In the summer of
1853, the hottest book in London was the gripping tale of the Hammond
Expedition into the forgotten jungles of Central America. Pedro Velasquez, one of the expedition
members, told the tale of how the intrepid team of explorers had penetrated
deep into the dense jungles, discovering the lost remnants of the Aztec Empire.
The explorers not
only discovered the lost “idolatrous city” of Ixihaya, but rescued the last two
members of the “Sacerdotal caste, (now nearly extinct) of the Ancient Aztec
Founders of the ruined temples.” These
last two members of the priestly class were children, worshipped by the other
natives. Or, as it said in the book:
“Forbidden,
inviolably sacred laws, from intermarrying with any persons but those of their
own caste, they had here dwindled down, in the course of many centuries, to a
few insignificant individuals, diminutive in stature. They were,
nevertheless, held in high veneration and affection by the whole Iximayan
community, probably as living specimens of an antique race nearly extinct.”
Hammond and
Velasquez were able to bring the two children, Bartola and Maximo, out of the
jungle and take them to New York, where their presence caused a sensation. The children were small even for their young
age, with proportionately
small heads, dressed in
colorful native garb, and obviously members of a different and strange
race. Everyone wanted to see them,
scientists discussed them in the newspapers, and a scholarly article was
published in the American Journal of
Medical Sciences.
All the public
attention guaranteed that the booklet detailing their rescue would be widely
read by a fascinated public. After they
were presented to everyone from Horace Greeley to President Millard Fillmore,
an eager public was finally able to view
the children for only twenty-five cents (half price for children).
When the Aztec
children, now known to be brother and sister, arrived in London, at the request
of Prince Albert, they were taken to Buckingham Palace and presented to Queen
Victoria. Publicly, she expressed a
happy fascination with the Aztecs, but privately in her diary she revealed she
found the exhibition of the children “disgusting and frightful”. (Perhaps a diminutive queen who was always on
public display could empathize).
After visiting the
queen, the children went on to tour Europe, meeting Napoleon III, Tsar
Alexander III of Russia, the Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria, as well as most
of the other crowned heads in every country they visited. For the next five decades, the two Aztec
children would be almost continually on display at various freak shows and
circuses as they traveled from Europe to the Americas and returned. Eventually, they were even displayed at P. T.
Barnum’s American Museum.
When they were
older, the siblings even married, as this was allowed in the customs of their
people. (At least, this is what their
handlers explained).
Of course, the
entire farce was a complete sham. Let’s
start at the beginning: There was
neither a Hammond expedition, nor a Pedro Velasquez. The Aztec city of Ixihaya never existed.
The sensational
booklet was a reworked version of an earlier account of the travels of John L.
Stephens, who had investigated the Mayan ruins of Central America. Basically, wherever Stephens had written
“Maya”, the new book was altered to say “Aztec”. The entire section about “rescuing the Aztec
children” was just pure nonsense.
Maximo and Bartola
(if those were their real names, were from El Salvador) and were suffering from microcephaly and cognitive developmental disability. It is very doubtful that the children could
ever have given consent to being exposed like zoo animals, which is why there
are no pictures of the children accompanying this blog post. Microcephalic children were frequently
exhibited as “pin heads”, or referred to as a cross between humans and apes.
Why
were so many people in so many countries willing to believe a rather obvious
hoax? At the time, most Western nations
were expanding their empires and found the notion of primitive and inferior races
to be comforting to a tortured conscience.
Eventually, most of the same nations would eagerly accept the concept of
Social Darwinism, wanting to believe that it was their duty to exploit peoples
too backward to take care of themselves—especially those who happened to be
living where there were valuable natural resources.
And
what happened to the poor children?
Eventually, the crowds that had rushed to see them found new wonders to
gape at and stopped coming. Over time,
the children were exhibited in smaller and smaller exhibit halls, then small
museums, and finally small traveling circuses.
The news reports are contradictory with one story reporting Maximo’s
death in South Carolina while traveling with a small circus. Other stories have them still being exhibited
as late as the 1880’s, but no one knows for sure what eventually happened to
the “last of the Aztecs”.
It
is doubtful that the children’s mother ever learned what happened to her
children after she had turned them over to the promoter who had taken them away
from El Salvador. Nor is it clear how
many years it took her to realize that the charlatan’s promise that the
children could be “cured by doctors in America” was a lie.
I never much cared for freak shows. It's interesting that charlatans of that era made their money on people anxious to believe they were superior to the rest of us. Also about the time the upper classes became fans of socialism (with themselves as the imagined leaders of the proletariat. Social Darwinism played a big role in resetting the idea of a hereditary elite class destined to rule. The old nobility really hated losing their privileges. Between Darwin and Marx, they found a new excuse for why they should be in charge.
ReplyDelete