I was thinking
about the habit of reusing ships' names, particularly the names of ships that
have distinguished service records.
There are—and probably always will be—a USS Enterprise, a USS
Wasp, and a USS Hornet.
These are the
names of ships that have distinguished themselves repeatedly throughout
American naval history, and the Navy keeps their traditions and history alive
by giving the names of older ships with a proud history to new ships.
Tradition is very
important to the Navy, and probably the best example of this would be the
thirteen buttons on the fly of the wool pants the sailors wear. Recruits tell each other that the buttons
represent the original thirteen colonies—a beautiful story that everyone knows
is true but which, unfortunately, is not based on fact. Navy pants used to have both five and nine
buttons, but switched to thirteen when the pants were redesigned and the fly
enlarged. (And most savvy sailors have
had their uniforms tailored to use more convenient Velcro—the buttons are just
for show.)
Some ship names
get used frequently: There have been ten
ships named after George Washington and five different destroyers named after
Civil War hero Admiral Farragut (this latter use despite the fact that
destroyers weren’t developed until well after the admiral’s death).
If you understand
how the Navy solicits budget increases from Congress, you won’t be surprised to
learn that every state in the union has had a battleship, a cruiser, or at
least a submarine named after it. Every
city large enough to have a congressional district within the city lines has
furnished a ship name. There have been
seven ships named after Boston and six named after Philadelphia.
The opposite is
also true—if a tragic disaster occurs on a ship, it is unlikely to see its name
issued to a new ship. Through no fault
of the captain or crew, the USS Pueblo was seized by North Korea over
fifty years ago, and it is unlikely the Navy will launch a new ship with that
name. Nor is there likely to be a new USS
Thresher or a new USS William D. Porter. (If you are not familiar with that last
unlucky ship, follow this link.)
Cruise lines are
unlikely to ever launch a new Andrea Doria or a new Lusitania. The Italians are also very unlikely to name a
ship after the Costa Concordia.
And while there are a couple of companies proposing to launch a new
version of the Titanic, I wouldn’t rush out to buy tickets. Even the Exxon
Valdez was renamed, very quietly—six times before she was
finally scrapped.
There is one ship
name however, that seems to be jinxed.
Unfortunately, it is the USS United States. The first such ship was one of the first six
frigates built by the United States, along with the Old Ironsides, the USS
Constitution. In her early days, she
had a glorious career in several wars, fighting twice against England, the
Barbary Pirates, and Mexico. In her old
age however, she was something of a wreck, rotting at the pier at Norfolk,
Virginia. When the Civil War started,
the Union Navy set fire to her, allowing her to sink at the pier.
The Confederates
needed ships, so they pumped her out, repaired her and relaunched her with the
somewhat improbable name of CSS United States. Finally, the Confederates decided to sink the
vessel to bottle up the Elizabeth River.
After she was sailed into position, the Confederate soldiers ruined a
crate of axes trying to batter through the tough live oak timber that made up
her hull. Finally, they bored through
the wood, allowing her to sink. The
Union raised her again, but unfortunately, this time the ship was broken up for
the valuable timber.
Just as the ship
was being broken up, a civilian steam brigantine (this means she had both sail
and a steam-powered screw) was launched.
The SS United States was a three-decked cargo ship, incredibly
expensive, and relatively fast.
Unfortunately, she ran around on Cape Romain and was a total loss. Her wreckage has just recently been located.
The second USS
United States was a battle cruiser, a type of ship that was neither fish
nor fowl at a time when the technology and designs of ships were changing
rapidly. Though the hull was laid down
during World War I, the priorities of the Navy switched during the war and
construction was begun and halted repeatedly.
When the war was over, construction began again, only to be cancelled by
the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922.
When the project was cancelled, the ship was only 12% completed.
The name was
retired for a while, but during the Second World War, we launched enough ships
that we literally ran out of suitable names.
(Want to win at trivia? Here is a
killer question that even my retired navy friends can’t answer. I just checked, and even Google has never
heard of this. What were the
"88 Sams"? They were the 88
Liberty ships we gave England during the war, all of which had ‘Sam’ in their
names.)
It is possible
that the Navy deliberately did not name a ship the "USS United States"
in order to avoid the inevitable hit to morale that would occur if the ship
were sunk. So many ships were lost that
the loss of any given ship was a very real possibility.
After the war,
however, the US Navy was in a new desperate fight—this time with the US Air
Force. The Air Force thought the Navy
was superfluous in a nuclear age, since all new wars would be fought with
bombers. Desperate to keep up, the Navy
came up with the idea of a super-aircraft carrier: a huge monster that could handle jet aircraft
and twin-engine jet bombers. And the
name, of course, would be the USS United States (or as the Navy
designated her, CVA-58). Money was
appropriated, blueprints were drawn and construction was begun.
Then, in 1949,
President Harry Truman pulled the plug on the project just after the keel was
laid. The photo at right is all of the
ship that was ever completed.
The SS United
States was launched next, which was the largest and fastest liner built in
the US. The ship was almost as large as
the aircraft carrier above and it still holds the Blue Ribbon for the
fastest crossing of the Atlantic, in both directions. The ship was designed to be converted into
either a troopship or a hospital ship in case of war (changing her name to the USS
United States). Unfortunately, she
has proven far too expensive to be operated profitably, and for the last 50
years she has been tied to a dock, slowly rusting away while various investors
try to figure out what to do with such a behemoth.
Meanwhile, the
Navy finally decided on a new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that would
finally be named the USS United States.
The keel was laid down in 1993, construction proceeded smoothly, the
ship was actually launched and is still in service. However, in February 1995, the Secretary of
the Navy renamed the new vessel the USS Harry Truman.
From the above, we
can piece together a couple of useful facts:
First, there are probably any number of luckier names for a ship. Second, Harry Truman killed the USS United
States... Twice!
You wonder if Harry Truman was trying to keep enough unnamed hulls in circulation to get one named after him.
ReplyDelete